29 C.F.R. §1926.103 - Respiratory protection

Cite as29 C.F.R. §1926.103
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v. Marshall, AFL-CIO-CL
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • January 30, 1981
    ...workers against general air contamination through engineering, work practice, and respirator controls. E.g., 29 C.F.R. §§ 1926.55, 1926.57, 1926.103, 1926.354(c) Page 1311 IX. SUMMARY The disposition of these petitions is as follows: 1. The rulemaking leading to the new lead standard was fr......
  • Adkisson v. Jacobs Eng'g Grp., Inc., : 3:13-CV-505-TAV-HBG
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. Eastern District of Tennessee
    • September 3, 2014
    ...1986). 11. Plaintiffs cite to 29 C.F.R. § 126.103; however, this regulation does not seem to exist. The correct citation appears to be 29 C.F.R. § 1926.103. That section states that "[t]he requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at 29......
  • Fluor Daniel v. Oshrc, 01-16462.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
    • June 26, 2002
    ...harmful exposures to employees, appropriate respiratory protective devices shall be provided by the employer and shall be used." 29 C.F.R. § 1926.103(a)(1) (1996).1 Subpart D, codified at 29 C.F.R. § 1926.55, listed various substances, including phosgene, which should be avoided above certa......
  • Daniel v. Osha Review Commission, 01-16462
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
    • June 26, 2002
    ...harmful exposures to employees, appropriate respiratory protective devices shall be provided by the employer and shall be used." 29 C.F.R. § 1926.103(a)(1) (1996).(FN2) Subpart D, codified at 29 C.F.R. § 1926.55, listed various substances, including phosgene, which should be avoided above c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • OSHA Guidance For COVID-19 Health and Safety Plans Required for Phased Reopenings of New York Businesses
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • May 20, 2020
    ...a Respiratory Protection Program is required to be implemented in general industry and construction settings. See, 29 C.F.R. §§ 1910.134 and 1926.103. OSHA has temporarily suspended the fit testing element of such programs, but employers should continue to monitor that status. For employers......
  • Management Update - April 2009
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • April 30, 2009
    ...Protection Factors (APFs) and Maximum Use Concentration (MUC) provisions. The final Respiratory Protection standard (29 CFR 1910.134 and 29 CFR 1926.103) applies to general industry, construction, longshoring, shipyard, and marine terminal workplaces. APF and MUC are mandatory respirator se......
1 books & journal articles
  • Construction Bills: Recent Changes to Construction Laws
    • United States
    • ABA General Library The Construction Lawyer No. 41-2, April 2021
    • April 1, 2021
    ...(OSHA 4000-2021) (2021), https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/iles/ publications/OSHA4000.pdf. 9. Protecting Workers , supra note 6. 10. 29 C.F.R. § 1926.103, https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/ regulations/standardnumber/1926/1926.103. Spring 2021 Published in The Construction Lawyer, Volume 41,......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT