29 CFR 1926.103 - Respiratory protection

Cite as29 CFR 1926.103
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
23 practice notes
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register August 24, 2006
    • 24 Agosto 2006
    ...of Gas Mask Canisters.'' The Agency promulgated an initial respiratory protection standard for the construction industry (29 CFR 1926.103) in April 1971. On February 9, 1979, OSHA formally applied 29 CFR 1910.134 to the construction industry (44 FR 8577). Federal agencies that preceded OSHA......
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 28, 2007
    • 28 Noviembre 2007
    ...including respirators, when needed to comply with this proposed standard. When employees use respirators, the respirator requirements in 29 CFR 1926.103 (Respiratory protection) must be met.\4\ For example, failure to use the appropriate filters in a respirator can render its use ineffectiv......
  • Electric Power Generation, Transmission, and Distribution; Electrical Protective Equipment
    • United States
    • Federal Register April 11, 2014
    • 11 Abril 2014
    ...buckets) do not provide sufficient protection. (See, also, the preamble to the final rule on respiratory protection, 29 CFR 1910.134 and 29 CFR 1926.103, which notes: ``Respiratory protection is a backup method which is used to protect employees from toxic materials in the workplace in thos......
  • Safety and health standards, etc.: Respiratory protection— Assigned protection factors,
    • United States
    • Federal Register June 06, 2003
    • 6 Junio 2003
    ...of Gas Mask Canisters.'' The Agency promulgated an initial Respiratory Protection Standard for the construction industry (29 CFR 1926.103) in April 1971. On February 9, 1979, OSHA formally applied 29 CFR 1910.134 to the construction industry (44 FR 8577). Agencies that preceded OSHA develop......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v. Marshall, AFL-CIO-CL
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • 30 Enero 1981
    ...workers against general air contamination through engineering, work practice, and respirator controls. E.g., 29 C.F.R. §§ 1926.55, 1926.57, 1926.103, 1926.354(c) Page 1311 IX. SUMMARY The disposition of these petitions is as follows: 1. The rulemaking leading to the new lead standard was fr......
  • Adkisson v. Jacobs Eng'g Grp., Inc., No.: 3:13-CV-505-TAV-HBG
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. Eastern District of Tennessee
    • 3 Septiembre 2014
    ...1986). 11. Plaintiffs cite to 29 C.F.R. § 126.103; however, this regulation does not seem to exist. The correct citation appears to be 29 C.F.R. § 1926.103. That section states that "[t]he requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at 29......
  • Fluor Daniel v. Oshrc, No. 01-16462.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • 26 Junio 2002
    ...harmful exposures to employees, appropriate respiratory protective devices shall be provided by the employer and shall be used." 29 C.F.R. § 1926.103(a)(1) (1996).1 Subpart D, codified at 29 C.F.R. § 1926.55, listed various substances, including phosgene, which should be avoided above certa......
  • Daniel v. Osha Review Commission, 01-16462
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
    • 26 Junio 2002
    ...harmful exposures to employees, appropriate respiratory protective devices shall be provided by the employer and shall be used." 29 C.F.R. § 1926.103(a)(1) (1996).(FN2) Subpart D, codified at 29 C.F.R. § 1926.55, listed various substances, including phosgene, which should be avoided above c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • OSHA Guidance For COVID-19 Health and Safety Plans Required for Phased Reopenings of New York Businesses
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 20 Mayo 2020
    ...a Respiratory Protection Program is required to be implemented in general industry and construction settings. See, 29 C.F.R. §§ 1910.134 and 1926.103. OSHA has temporarily suspended the fit testing element of such programs, but employers should continue to monitor that status. For employers......
  • Management Update - April 2009
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 30 Abril 2009
    ...Protection Factors (APFs) and Maximum Use Concentration (MUC) provisions. The final Respiratory Protection standard (29 CFR 1910.134 and 29 CFR 1926.103) applies to general industry, construction, longshoring, shipyard, and marine terminal workplaces. APF and MUC are mandatory respirator se......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT