49 CFR 1106.6 - Reservation of Jurisdiction

Cite as49 CFR 1106.6
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Railroad consolidations, mergers, and acquisitions of control: Safety integration plans,
    • United States
    • Federal Register March 15, 2002
    • March 15, 2002
    ...railroads typically create sufficient safety problems to warrant requiring the preparation of a SIP. However, the Board's final rule at 49 CFR 1106.6 would allow the agency to require a SIP in particular cases involving Class III railroads if it concluded that doing so is necessary in its p......
  • Union Elec. Co. v. U.S., Nos. 79-1844
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • July 16, 1980
    ...is not required when the ICC decides not to investigate. ICC Implementation of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, 49 C.F.R. § 1106.6(b). NITCOM also claims that the ICC did not follow its own regulations because it failed to require specific cost and revenue data on insulating ......
1 cases
  • Union Elec. Co. v. U.S., Nos. 79-1844
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • July 16, 1980
    ...is not required when the ICC decides not to investigate. ICC Implementation of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, 49 C.F.R. § 1106.6(b). NITCOM also claims that the ICC did not follow its own regulations because it failed to require specific cost and revenue data on insulating ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT