10 CFR 2.206 - Requests for action under this subpart
| Cite as | 10 CFR 2.206 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
337 practice notes
-
Part II
...action on a combined license or manufacturing license on the basis of an inadequate impact assessment could file a petition under 10 CFR 2.206, ``Requests for action under this Applicants are only required to submit a description of the identified design features and functional capabilities......
-
Safeguards information protection from inadvertent release and unauthorized disclosure,
...petitions for rulemaking under 10 CFR 2.802, and file requests to institute a proceeding to modify, suspend, or revoke a license under 10 CFR 2.206. Members of the public may seek to initiate or participate in adjudications held in connection with proposed licensing actions. They may also a......
-
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
...would be a formal or informal hearing. A request to modify the terms of a combined license would be handled as a request for action under 10 CFR 2.206. Part 52 was promptly challenged after its promulgation. A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued a decision that up......
-
Part II
...and (3) the ``terms and conditions of an early site permit should be modified,'' which are to be processed in accordance with 10 CFR 2.206(a)(2)(iii). With the benefit of hindsight and experience gained in reviewing the first three early site permit applications, the NRC believes that all i......
Request a trial to view additional results
62 cases
-
Arnow v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com'n, No. 87-1732
...in the first two categories by noting that he had addressed the same or similar concerns in previous petitions brought pursuant to 10 C.F.R. Sec. 2.206. He concluded that the concerns raised in the instant petition already had received sufficient consideration from the NRC and therefore he ......
-
State of N.J., Dept. of Environmental Protection and Energy v. Long Island Power Authority, No. 93-5613
...See 58 Fed.Reg. 58203 (1993). Finally, NJDEPE could have petitioned to modify, suspend, or revoke PECo's amended license under 10 C.F.R. Sec. 2.206, alleging a license violation or "potentially hazardous conditions or other facts deemed to be sufficient ground for the proposed action," id. ......
-
Commonwealth Edison Co. v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com'n, No. 85-2928
...to the NRC's denial of a request to institute a proceeding to suspend a nuclear plant's operating license. Id. at 1605, 1608; see 10 C.F.R. Sec. 2.206. The core issue was whether to suspend a Page 613 license by invoking a section 2239(a) proceeding. The ancillary issue was whether to grant......
-
Massachusetts v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, Nos. 12–1404
...that the NRC initiate proceedings to determine whether the Pilgrim plant license would have been granted under the new criteria. See10 C.F.R. § 2.206(a).26 And, if that request is denied, Massachusetts can petition to the court of appeals, see Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Lorion, 470 U.S. 729,......
Request a trial to view additional results