11 CFR 9038.2 - Repayments
| Cite as | 11 CFR 9038.2 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 practice notes
-
Separate Parts In This Issue
Part II
Federal Election Commission,
...and the proposed revisions at 11 CFR 9003.3(a)(2)(i)(D) specified that GELACs may also make primary campaign repayments required under 11 CFR 9038.2 or 9038.3. One commenter stated the revision is justified, provided the rule does not require that repayments must be made before other permis......
-
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act; implementation:
Presidential candidates and nominating conventions; public financing,
...and the proposed revisions at 11 CFR 9003.3(a)(2)(i)(D) specified that GELACs may also make primary campaign repayments required under 11 CFR 9038.2 or 9038.3. One commenter stated the revision is justified, provided the rule does not require that repayments must be made before other permis......
-
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act; implementation:
Presidential candidates and nominating conventions; public financing,
...DOI to pay for winding down costs in excess of the restrictions after the committee's accounts no longer contain any matching funds. See 11 CFR 9038.2(b)(2)(iii)(B) and (iv). Primary candidates who have a surplus at the DOI would be required to make a surplus repayment to the United States ......
-
Separate Parts In This Issue
Part IV
Federal Election Commission,
...DOI to pay for winding down costs in excess of the restrictions after the committee's accounts no longer contain any matching funds. See 11 CFR 9038.2(b)(2)(iii)(B) and (iv). Primary candidates who have a surplus at the DOI would be required to make a surplus repayment to the United States ......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
Carter/Mondale Presidential Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election Com'n, No. 82-1754
...that the Committee had to repay $129,443.70 within 90 days. See Joint Appendix ("J.A.") at 4. The letter further explained that under 11 C.F.R. § 9038.2(b) (1981) the Committee had 30 days to submit legal or factual materials in opposition to the FEC's repayment determination, and that the ......
-
Kennedy for President Committee v. Federal Election Com'n, No. 83-1521
...made to a candidate from the matching payment account or any contributions received by the candidate" used for unqualified purposes. 11 C.F.R. Sec. 9038.2(a)(2) (1982) (emphasis added). 3 Thus the regulations require repayment of unqualified expenditures regardless of whether the expenditur......
-
John Glenn Presidential Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election Com'n, No. 86-1348
...determination, rendered May 15, 1986, by the Federal Election Commission (FEC or Commission). See 26 U.S.C. Sec. 9038(b)(2) and 11 C.F.R. Sec. 9038.2 (Commission repayment determinations); 26 U.S.C. Sec. 9041(a) (judicial review). The Glenn Committee received approximately $2,800,000 in fed......
-
Simon v. Federal Election Com'n, No. 93-1252
...Expenditures in excess of these limits are not "qualified campaign expenses" for which candidates may use their matching funds. 11 C.F.R. Sec. 9038.2(b) The Act requires the Federal Election Commission ("the Commission" or "FEC") to conduct a thorough examination and audit of the campaign f......
Request a trial to view additional results