43 CFR 10.10 - Repatriation

Cite as43 CFR 10.10
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
171 practice notes
  • Part III
    • United States
    • Federal Register March 15, 2010
    • March 15, 2010
    ...Indian tribes, or Native Hawaiian organizations may claim human remains and associated funerary objects has been in effect since 1996 (43 CFR 10.10(b)(2)). No Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization recommended this Comment 143: One commenter requested clarification of how the Review C......
  • State v. Taylor, NO. SCWC-28904
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Hawai'i
    • December 15, 2011
    ...repatriation of "Native American human remains and objectsPage 26possessed or controlled by Federal agencies and museums[.]"25 See also 43 C.F.R. § 10.10. For example, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 3005(a)(1) and 43 C.F.R. § 10.10(b)(1), a federal agency or museum must "expeditiously" return huma......
  • State v. Taylor, No. SCWC–28904.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Hawai'i
    • December 15, 2011
    ...the repatriation of "Native American human remains and objects possessed or controlled by Federal agencies and museums[.]"25 See also 43 C.F.R. § 10.10. For example, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 3005(a)(1) and 43 C.F.R. § 10.10(b)(1), a federal agency or museum must "expeditiously" return human ......
  • Navajo Nation v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, No. 13–15710.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • April 6, 2016
    ...remains, see Maj. op. at 1093, and its argument that it has legal property rights in the items that supersede the NAGPRA process. See 43 C.F.R. §§ 10.10(c)(2); 10.11(e).4 The majority's theory that the Park Service made a reviewable "threshold determination" of its property rights in the re......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • State v. Taylor, NO. SCWC-28904
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Hawai'i
    • December 15, 2011
    ...repatriation of "Native American human remains and objectsPage 26possessed or controlled by Federal agencies and museums[.]"25 See also 43 C.F.R. § 10.10. For example, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 3005(a)(1) and 43 C.F.R. § 10.10(b)(1), a federal agency or museum must "expeditiously" return huma......
  • State v. Taylor, No. SCWC–28904.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Hawai'i
    • December 15, 2011
    ...the repatriation of "Native American human remains and objects possessed or controlled by Federal agencies and museums[.]"25 See also 43 C.F.R. § 10.10. For example, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 3005(a)(1) and 43 C.F.R. § 10.10(b)(1), a federal agency or museum must "expeditiously" return human ......
  • Navajo Nation v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, No. 13–15710.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • April 6, 2016
    ...remains, see Maj. op. at 1093, and its argument that it has legal property rights in the items that supersede the NAGPRA process. See 43 C.F.R. §§ 10.10(c)(2); 10.11(e).4 The majority's theory that the Park Service made a reviewable "threshold determination" of its property rights in the re......
  • Fallon Paiute-Shoshone v. U.S. Bureau of Land Man., No. 03:04-CV-0466-LRH(RAM).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. District of Nevada
    • September 21, 2006
    ...are affiliated with a Native American tribe, the remains are to be repatriated expeditiously upon request. 25 U.S.C. § 3005(a); 43 C.F.R. § 10.10(b). When the remains are deemed unaffiliated, however, the process is not considered complete. After a finding of non-affiliation, interested Nat......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
165 provisions
  • Part III
    • United States
    • Federal Register March 15, 2010
    • March 15, 2010
    ...Indian tribes, or Native Hawaiian organizations may claim human remains and associated funerary objects has been in effect since 1996 (43 CFR 10.10(b)(2)). No Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization recommended this Comment 143: One commenter requested clarification of how the Review C......
  • Notice of Inventory Completion: Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville, TN
    • United States
    • National Park Service
    • Invalid date
    ...Hawaiian organization, or the ‘‘aboriginal land’’ of an Indian Tribe pursuant to 43 CFR 10.11. Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3006(c)(5) and 43 CFR 10.10(g)(2)(ii) and 10.16, the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee (Review Committee) may make a recommendation to the S......
  • Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act: Federal Bureau of Investigation, KY; intent to repatriate a cultural item,
    • United States
    • Federal Register August 29, 2002
    • August 29, 2002
    ...Notice. Notice is hereby given in accordance with the provisions of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 43 CFR 10.10 (a)(3), of the intent to repatriate cultural items in the possession of the U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)......
  • Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Z-Wave Alliance, Inc.
    • United States
    • Antitrust Division,Justice Department
    • Invalid date
    ...not the ‘‘tribal land’’ of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian organization, or the ‘‘aboriginal land of any Indian Tribe. •Pursuant to 43 CFR 10.10(g)(2)(ii) and 10.16, the disposition of the human remains and associated funerary objects will be to the Match-e-be-nash-she-wish Band of Pott......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT