8 CFR 1003.2 - Reopening or reconsideration before the Board of Immigration Appeals
| Cite as | 8 CFR 1003.2 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4762 practice notes
-
Immigration:
Aliens; voluntary departure review,
...kind of motion, a motion to remand, can be filed only during the pendency of an appeal, but not after the issuance of a final order. 8 CFR 1003.2(c)(4) states, ``A motion to reopen a decision rendered by an Immigration Judge or [DHS] officer that is pending when an appeal is filed, or that ......
-
Motions To Reopen Removal, Deportation, or Exclusion Proceedings Based Upon a Claim of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
...sought to be offered is material and was not available and could not have been discovered or presented at the former hearing.''); 8 CFR 1003.2(c)(1) (``A motion to reopen proceedings shall not be granted unless it appears to the Board that evidence sought to be offered is material and was n......
-
Immigration:
Criminal activity victims; U nonimmigrant classification,
...ICE counsel may agree, as a matter of discretion, to join such a motion to overcome any applicable time and numerical limitations of 8 CFR 1003.2 and 1003.23. Id. e. Aliens Seeking Change of Nonimmigrant Aliens who currently are in a nonimmigrant status may seek to change their classificati......
-
Appellate Procedures and Decisional Finality in Immigration Proceedings; Administrative Closure
...in accordance with the standard procedures for such motions, i.e., compliance with the substantive requirements for such a motion at 8 CFR 1003.2(c). These prohibitions have three exceptions for new evidence: (1) The result of identity, law enforcement, or security investigations or examina......
Request a trial to view additional results
4728 cases
-
Shi Liang Lin v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, Docket No. 02-4611-ag.
...Just as a change in United States asylum law does not qualify as a "change in circumstances" sufficient to reopen an asylum case under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii) (permitting motion to reopen "based on changed circumstances arising in the country of nationality or in the country to which de......
-
Conteh v. Gonzales, No. 05-1282.
...See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1182(h)(1)(B), 1255(a). The petitioner did not submit an application for either the waiver or the adjustment, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1); did not allege that his Page 52 would be subject to extreme hardship if the removal order was executed against him, see 8 U.S.C. § 1182(......
-
Garcia–Carias v. Holder, No. 11–60550.
...HOLDER, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.No. 11–60550.United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit.Sept. 27, 2012. Held Invalid8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.2(d), 1003.23(b)(1) [697 F.3d 259]Ronaldo Rauseo–Ricupero (argued), Maia Harris, Danielle Mairin McLaughlin, Nixon Peabody, L.L.P., Boston, M......
-
Etemadi v. Garland, 18-72318
...Etemadi's motion to reopen on three grounds. First, it held that Etemadi had not submitted the required application for relief. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1). Second, the BIA determined that any evidence of changed country conditions for Christians was irrelevant because he was found not to b......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Supreme Court Decides Mata v. Lynch
...removal order. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7). The Board also has the authority to reopen the removal proceedings sua sponte at any time. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a). An immigration judge ordered Noel Reyes Mata, a Mexican citizen, removed after Mata was convicted of assault in Texas. Mata’s attorney file......
2 books & journal articles
-
Advancing Executive Branch Immigration Policy Through the Attorney General's Review Authority
...earlier noted.275Such considerations have been 268. See id. at 5–6. 269. Id. at 6–7. 270. Id. at 10–20. 271. Id. at 20–22; see also 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1) (2015) (“[N]or shall any motion to reopen for the purpose of affording the alien an opportunity to apply for any form of discretionary ......
-
Social Media and Online Persecution
...63, 67–68 (1st Cir. 2013); Xue Hui Zhang v. Mukasey, 303 F. App’x 9, 10 (2d Cir. 2008). See generally 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(ii); 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.2(c)(3), 1003.23(b)(4)(i) (2021) (motions to reopen proceedings based on changed country conditions). 85. See Almeda-Guzman, 788 F. App’x at ......