19 CFR 111.36 - Relations with unlicensed persons
| Cite as | 19 CFR 111.36 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
United States v. Santos
...required by 19 U.S.C. § 1641(d)(2)(A). The court will address each count in turn.I. Count I Count I alleges that Santos violated 19 C.F.R. § 111.36 when he conducted business with a freight forwarder, SPR, without forwarding a copy of his bill to the importer of record. Compl. ¶¶ 6–10. A br......
-
United States v. Santos, Slip Op. 12 - 151
...required by 19 U.S.C. § 1641(d)(2)(A). The court will address each count in turn.I. Count I Count I alleges that Santos violated 19 C.F.R. § 111.36 when he conducted business with a freight forwarder, SPR, without forwarding a copy of his bill to the importer ofPage 9record. Compl. ¶¶ 6-10.......
-
United States v. Freight Forwarder Int'l, Inc., Slip Op. 15–5.
...2010 for $10,000, alleging that Defendant was in violation of 19 U.S.C § 1641(a)(2), (b)(1), and (b)(6) and 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.1, 111.2, 111.4, 111.36, 111.91, and 171 App. C II(A), (B), and (C). See Pl.'s Compl. ¶ 9; Pl.'s Exs. 1. The pre-penalty notice informed Defendant of its 30–day right......
-
United States v. Freight Forwarder Int'l, Inc., Slip Op. 15–5.
...2010 for $10,000, alleging that Defendant was in violation of 19 U.S.C § 1641(a)(2), (b)(1), and (b)(6) and 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.1, 111.2, 111.4, 111.36, 111.91, and 171 App. C II(A), (B), and (C). See Pl.'s Compl. ¶ 9; Pl.'s Exs. 1. The pre-penalty notice informed Defendant of its 30–day right......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
United States v. Santos
...required by 19 U.S.C. § 1641(d)(2)(A). The court will address each count in turn.I. Count I Count I alleges that Santos violated 19 C.F.R. § 111.36 when he conducted business with a freight forwarder, SPR, without forwarding a copy of his bill to the importer of record. Compl. ¶¶ 6–10. A br......
-
United States v. Santos, Slip Op. 12 - 151
...required by 19 U.S.C. § 1641(d)(2)(A). The court will address each count in turn.I. Count I Count I alleges that Santos violated 19 C.F.R. § 111.36 when he conducted business with a freight forwarder, SPR, without forwarding a copy of his bill to the importer ofPage 9record. Compl. ¶¶ 6-10.......
-
United States v. Freight Forwarder Int'l, Inc., Slip Op. 15–5.
...2010 for $10,000, alleging that Defendant was in violation of 19 U.S.C § 1641(a)(2), (b)(1), and (b)(6) and 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.1, 111.2, 111.4, 111.36, 111.91, and 171 App. C II(A), (B), and (C). See Pl.'s Compl. ¶ 9; Pl.'s Exs. 1. The pre-penalty notice informed Defendant of its 30–day right......
-
United States v. Freight Forwarder Int'l, Inc., Slip Op. 15–5.
...2010 for $10,000, alleging that Defendant was in violation of 19 U.S.C § 1641(a)(2), (b)(1), and (b)(6) and 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.1, 111.2, 111.4, 111.36, 111.91, and 171 App. C II(A), (B), and (C). See Pl.'s Compl. ¶ 9; Pl.'s Exs. 1. The pre-penalty notice informed Defendant of its 30–day right......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Customs Broker Regulations Update – What Was CBP Thinking?
...forwarder, not the broker. The forwarder hires the broker and directs what is to be done. The current regulation can be found at 19 C.F.R. 111.36(c)(3) and makes clear the forwarder cannot bar the broker from having direct contact with the importer, although for relationship reasons some ma......