29 CFR 1614.203 - Rehabilitation Act

Cite as29 CFR 1614.203
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
252 practice notes
  • 193 F.Supp.2d 364 (D.Mass. 2002), Civ. A. 99-30222, Lolos v. Solutia, Inc.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 1st Circuit United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Massachusetts
    • March 26, 2002
    ...Runyon, 222 F.3d 1150, 1153 (9th Cir. 2000). Thereafter, in October of 1992, the regulations were amended to reflect this change. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.203 (2001). As a result, the substantive standards for handicap discrimination are now deemed the same whether suit is filed under the Rehab......
  • 77 F.3d 189 (7th Cir. 1996), 94-3059, Miller v. Runyon
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Courts of Appeals United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • February 26, 1996
    ...1391, 1394-95 (7th Cir.1994). But all that case holds is that the then current regulations (since changed, see id. at 1395 n. 5; 29 C.F.R. § 1614.203(g)) under the Rehabilitation Act did not require the employer to offer the disabled employee a different kind of job. The plaintiff in that c......
  • 193 F.Supp.2d 364 (D.Mass. 2002), Civ. A. 99-30222, Lolos v. Solutia, Inc.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 1st Circuit United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Massachusetts
    • March 26, 2002
    ...Runyon, 222 F.3d 1150, 1153 (9th Cir. 2000). Thereafter, in October of 1992, the regulations were amended to reflect this change. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.203 (2001). As a result, the substantive standards for handicap discrimination are now deemed the same whether suit is filed under the Rehab......
  • 665 F.Supp.2d 1054 (D.Neb. 2009), 4:08CV3241, Loos v. Napolitano
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 8th Circuit United States District Court of Nebraska
    • October 21, 2009
    ...to be applied in cases alleging employment discrimination under various portions of Rehabilitation Act shall be those in ADA); 29 C.F.R. § 1614.203 (standards to be used to determine violation of Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 791, are those applied under ADA). Although the Rehabilitation ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
228 cases
  • 808 A.2d 863 (N.J.Super.A.D. 2002), Soules v. Mount Holiness Memorial Park
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court of New Jersey
    • November 6, 2002
    ...of the impairment, then, is significant under the ADA, RA, and similarly patterned state laws. E.g., 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(j)(2)(ii); 29 C.F.R. § 1614.203(b). Because of this requirement, all of the federal and out-of-state cases cited by the motion judge do stand for the proposition that &quo......
  • 193 F.Supp.2d 364 (D.Mass. 2002), Civ. A. 99-30222, Lolos v. Solutia, Inc.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 1st Circuit United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Massachusetts
    • March 26, 2002
    ...Runyon, 222 F.3d 1150, 1153 (9th Cir. 2000). Thereafter, in October of 1992, the regulations were amended to reflect this change. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.203 (2001). As a result, the substantive standards for handicap discrimination are now deemed the same whether suit is filed under the Rehab......
  • 193 F.Supp.2d 364 (D.Mass. 2002), Civ. A. 99-30222, Lolos v. Solutia, Inc.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 1st Circuit United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Massachusetts
    • March 26, 2002
    ...Runyon, 222 F.3d 1150, 1153 (9th Cir. 2000). Thereafter, in October of 1992, the regulations were amended to reflect this change. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.203 (2001). As a result, the substantive standards for handicap discrimination are now deemed the same whether suit is filed under the Rehab......
  • 110 Cal.App.4th 963, C041708, Hastings v. Department of Corrections
    • United States
    • California California Court of Appeals
    • July 22, 2003
    ...443]), both acts specify "reassignment to a vacant position" as a reasonable accommodation. (§ 12926, subd. (n)(2); 29 C.F.R. § 1614.203(g) (2001); 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2, subd. 30.2, subd. (o(2)(ii) (2002).) Where as here, the particular provision in question in the FEHA is similar t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Annual Report on EEOC Developments — Fiscal Year 2017
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • February 28, 2018
    ...the Rehabilitation Act (Sept. 18, 2017), available at https://www.eeoc.gov/federal/directives/personal-assistance-services.cfm. 336  29 C.F.R. § 1614.203(d)(5). 337  EEOC, Questions and Answers: Federal Agencies’ Obligation to Provide Personal Assistance Services (PAS) under Section 501 of ......
1 books & journal articles
24 provisions
  • Adverse Actions
    • United States
    • Federal Register September 18, 2008
    • May 31, 2005
    ...must provide information concerning disability retirement. The agency must be aware of the affirmative obligations of the provisions of 29 CFR 1614.203, which require reasonable accommodation of a qualified individual with a (g) Agency decision. (1) In arriving at its decision, the agency w......
  • Medical Qualification Determinations
    • United States
    • Federal Register January 18, 2017
    • January 18, 2017
    ...this OPM regulation and suggested three additional citations relevant to medical qualification determinations. Two other citations, 29 CFR 1614.203(a) and 29 CFR 1614.203(b), were enforcement regulations and outside of the scope of this regulation. OPM has declined to accept this change. Up......
  • Adverse Actions
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 04, 2009
    • October 30, 2004
    ...must provide information concerning disability retirement. The agency must be aware of the affirmative obligations of the provisions of 29 CFR 1614.203, which require reasonable accommodation of a qualified individual with a (g) Agency decision. (1) In arriving at its decision, the agency w......
  • Federal sector equal employment opportunity: Americans with Disabilities Act nondiscrimination standards; applicability to Section 501 of Rehabilitation Act,
    • United States
    • Federal Register March 01, 2000
    • March 1, 2000
    ...From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr01mr00-21] EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 29 CFR Part 1614 RIN 3046-AA57 Federal Sector Equal Employment Opportunity AGENCY: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT