30 CFR 773.5 - Regulatory coordination with requirements under other laws
| Cite as | 30 CFR 773.5 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 practice notes
-
Department of Interior, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement,
...510(c) of SMCRA. Id. at 5. Next, the court addressed NMA's challenge to certain of the IFR's presumptions of ownership or control. At 30 CFR 773.5(b)(1) through (6), the IFR contains six separate presumptions of ownership or control. If subject to one of the presumptions, the applicant (or ......
-
Surface coal mining and reclamation operations:
Ownership, control, transfer, assignment, or sale of permit rights,
...ownership. Moreover, we used the statutory term ``owning of record'' in our ownership and control rules from 1988 through 2000. See, e.g., 30 CFR 773.5 (2000). It was only in our 2000 rule that we used the phrase ``possessing or controlling'' in our ownership definition, and that definition......
-
Stream Protection Rule
...paragraph (b)(2)(v) would require consideration of the time required to complete the interagency permitting coordination process under 30 CFR 773.5. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \209\ 30 U.S.C. Finally, we propose to redesignate existing 30 CFR......
-
Part II
...ownership. Moreover, we used the statutory term ``owning of record'' in our ownership and control rules from 1988 through 2000. See, e.g., 30 CFR 773.5 (2000). It was only in our 2000 rule that we used the phrase ``possessing or controlling'' in our ownership definition, and that definition......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
-
Pittston Co. v. Lujan, Civ. A. No. 91-0006-A.
...§ 1260(c)1, and revising the scope of review of a permit applicant's environmental compliance record prior to issuance of new permits. 30 C.F.R. § 773.5, 773.15(b).2 At the same time, OSM established the Applicant/Violator System ("AVS"), a computer system that identifies whether ......
-
Arch Mineral Corp. v. Babbitt, Civ. A. No. 2:95-0032.
...Diamond Shamrock Coal and (b) OSM's determination that Diamond Shamrock Coal was a presumed owner or controller of Greendale under 30 C.F.R. § 773.5(b)(6).894 F. Supp. 978 debts. OSM informed Arch it can avoid becoming permit-blocked by pato Arch's Memorandum in Support of Preliminary Injun......
-
West Virginia Div. of Environmental Protection v. Kingwood Coal Co., No. 23876
...or indirectly to determine the manner in which the relevant surface coal mining operation is conducted.' Memorandum, at p. 2 (quoting 30 C.F.R. § 773.5(b)(6)). Though the Solicitor believed that the outcome of the Spur case should not be disturbed, he indicated that "its reasoning shou......
-
Nat'l Mining Assoc. v. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, No. 96-5274
...desires. At any rate, by our count NMA specifically argued against the following old AVS rules issued by the Office of Surface Mining: 30 C.F.R. 773.5, 773.20(c), 773.23(b), 773.24, 773.25 & 778.14(c) (1999). In its supplemental brief, NMA agrees with the government that the new AVS rul......
Request a trial to view additional results