29 CFR 4.187 - Recovery of underpayments
| Cite as | 29 CFR 4.187 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
-
Bailey v. Dejoy, 1:20-cv-00042-JAW
...including, in part, the authority to "hold hearings, make decisions based on findings of fact, and take other appropriate action"); 29 C.F.R. § 4.187 (regulating enforcement of the SCA and related administrative proceedings). Because Plaintiff has not asserted and the record does not otherw......
-
BCFS Health & Human Servs. v. United States Dep't of Labor, SA-21-CV-0776-JKP
...been delegated to the contracting agencies and such matters cannot be appealed under the disputes clause in the contractor's contract. 29 C.F.R. § 4.187(f). In general, when a contractor or subcontractor disputes alleged violations, enforcement proceedings begin with the filing of an admini......
-
Mayes v. Excelsior Ambulance Serv., Inc., Civil Action No.: 3:17-cv-02358-JMC
...action against the contractor . . . to recover the remaining amount of underpayment." 41 U.S.C. § 6705(b) (emphasis added). See also 29 C.F.R. § 4.187(b) ("Section 5(b) of the Act provides that if the accrued payments withheld under the terms of the contract are insufficient to reimburse al......
-
Johnson v. Prospect Waterproofing Co., Civil Action No. 11–0077 (ABJ).
...same reasoning would apply in the case of the DBA since the administrative enforcement schemes in the two statutes are similar. Compare 29 C.F.R. §§ 4.187–.191, 8.2–.18 with 29 C.F.R. §§ 5.6, 5.9–.13, 5.18–.19, 7.2–.18. [813 F.Supp.2d 9] Thus, prior case law suggests that it is likely that ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Decisions of the DOL Administrative Review Board – March 2015
...of the contract, including the labor policy or employment conditions regarding the employees engaged in contract performance.’ 29 C.F.R. § 4.187(e)(4).” USDOL/OALJ Reporter at 8 (case citations omitted). Jackson v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., ARB No. 13-042, ALJ No. 2012-FRS-17 (ARB Mar. 20......