18 C.F.R. §35.26 - Recovery of stranded costs by public utilities and transmitting utilities
| Cite as | 18 C.F.R. §35.26 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Transmission Access Policy Study v. Fed Energy Comm'n., 97-1715
...requirements contracts entered into on or before July 11, 1994 (the date of the stranded cost notice of proposed rulemaking). See 18 C.F.R. § 35.26(b)(8), As to precisely who should pay for stranded costs, utilities and customers not surprisingly had dramatically different positions. Custom......
-
Transmission Access Policy Study Group v. Fed Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 97-1715
...requirements contracts entered into on or before July 11, 1994 (the date of the stranded cost notice of proposed rule-making). See 18 C.F.R. s 35.26(b)(8), As to precisely who should pay for stranded costs, utilities and customers not surprisingly had dramatically different positions. Custo......
-
Town of Norwood MA v. Fed'l Energy Reg. Comm'n, s. 98-1847
...customers who had previously been power customers of the integrated supplier but now chose to use only its transmission system. See 18 C.F.R. § 35.26(b)(1), (c)(2) (1999). Norwood's first objection to the contract termination charge in this case is that although Norwood previously bought po......
-
Appeal of Sinclair Mach. Products, Inc., 84-380
...rate base." Id. at 55, 480 A.2d at 25. The FERC, however, has applied a different rule in setting the wholesale rate in this case. See, 18 C.F.R. 35.26 (allowing CWIP in rate base). Costs related to the abandonment of the Pilgrim II and Montague plants have been allowed by the FERC in deter......
Request a trial to view additional results