37 CFR 1.143 - Reconsideration of requirement

Cite as37 CFR 1.143
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 practice notes
  • Patent cases: Patent business goals; implementation,
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 05, 1998
    • October 5, 1998
    ...disagrees with the propriety of the restriction requirement, the applicant would continue to have the right to request reconsideration (37 CFR 1.143) and review (37 CFR 1.144) of the restriction requirement. The only change is that an applicant's election would be a constructive election ba......
  • Univ. of Mass. v. Kappos, Civil Action No. 10–00894 (ESH).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • November 9, 2012
    ...of rejected applications), and this pattern of exchange is built into the agency's duly promulgated regulations, see, e.g.,37 C.F.R. § 1.143 (“If the applicant disagrees with the requirement for restriction, he may request reconsideration and withdrawal or modification of the requirement, g......
  • Univ. of Mass. v. Kappos, Civil Action No. 10-00894 (ESH)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • November 9, 2012
    ...reexamination of rejected applications), and this pattern of exchange is built into the agency's duly promulgated regulations, see, e.g., 37 CFR §1.143 ("If the applicant disagrees with the requirement for restriction, he may request reconsideration and withdrawal or modification of the req......
  • Ex parte Van Vliet, Appeal 2004-1950
    • United States
    • United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board
    • January 28, 2005
    ...take issue with the examiner's requirement for restriction (brief, pages 20-21). This matter is petitionable and thus, not before us. 37 CFR §§ 1.143 and 1.144 (2003). See In re Watkinson, 900 F.2d 230, 233, 14 U.S.P.Q.2d 1407, 1409-10 (Fed. Cir. 1990); In re Hengehold, 440 F.2d 1395, 1404,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • Univ. of Mass. v. Kappos, Civil Action No. 10–00894 (ESH).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • November 9, 2012
    ...of rejected applications), and this pattern of exchange is built into the agency's duly promulgated regulations, see, e.g.,37 C.F.R. § 1.143 (“If the applicant disagrees with the requirement for restriction, he may request reconsideration and withdrawal or modification of the requirement, g......
  • Univ. of Mass. v. Kappos, Civil Action No. 10-00894 (ESH)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • November 9, 2012
    ...reexamination of rejected applications), and this pattern of exchange is built into the agency's duly promulgated regulations, see, e.g., 37 CFR §1.143 ("If the applicant disagrees with the requirement for restriction, he may request reconsideration and withdrawal or modification of the req......
  • Ex parte Van Vliet, Appeal 2004-1950
    • United States
    • United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board
    • January 28, 2005
    ...take issue with the examiner's requirement for restriction (brief, pages 20-21). This matter is petitionable and thus, not before us. 37 CFR §§ 1.143 and 1.144 (2003). See In re Watkinson, 900 F.2d 230, 233, 14 U.S.P.Q.2d 1407, 1409-10 (Fed. Cir. 1990); In re Hengehold, 440 F.2d 1395, 1404,......
  • Advantek Mktg., Inc. v. Shanghai Walk-Long Tools Co., 2017-1314
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • August 1, 2018
    ...reply to this requirement must include an election of a single group for prosecution on the merits, even if this requirement is traversed. 37 CFR 1.143. Any reply that does not include an election of a single group will be held nonresponsive.J.A. 181. Advantek elected Group I, stating:Altho......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT