5 CFR 2429.17 - Reconsideration

Cite as5 CFR 2429.17
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
44 practice notes
  • National Ass'n of Government Employees v. FLRA, Civ. A. No. 2:93cv83.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Virginia)
    • June 29, 1993
    ...0-AR-1982, 39 F.L.R.A. (No. 56) 692. On February 27, 1991, the Union requested reconsideration of the Authority's decision pursuant to 5 C.F.R. § 2429.17. The Authority denied reconsideration on March 15, 1991. No. 0-AR-1982, 39 F.L.R.A. (No. 106) On July 9, 1991, an arbitration award was i......
  • U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, AFL-CI
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • September 23, 1987
    ...the negotiated grievance procedure. The FLRA denied the HHS motion for reconsideration as untimely, noting that under FLRA rules (5 C.F.R. Sec. 2429.17) a motion for reconsideration is due within ten days of the FLRA decision in a particular case. This appeal followed. We have jurisdiction ......
  • U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, AFL-CI
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • April 19, 1988
    ...to Reconsider" was denied as untimely because such motions are required to be filed within 10 days after service of an FLRA order. 5 C.F.R. Sec. 2429.17. There are no extraordinary circumstances warranting this court's consideration of the above issue. HHS had three months after the Supreme......
  • N.L.R.B. v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, No. 91-1608
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • August 31, 1993
    ...to press [a] claim before the FLRA"). Given the similarity of the FLRA's and NLRB's motion for reconsideration provisions, compare 5 C.F.R. Sec. 2429.17 (1993) (FLRA) with 29 C.F.R. Sec. 102.48(d) (1992) (NLRB), these holdings should apply with equal force to FLRA proceedings. In the presen......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
43 cases
  • National Ass'n of Government Employees v. FLRA, Civ. A. No. 2:93cv83.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Virginia)
    • June 29, 1993
    ...0-AR-1982, 39 F.L.R.A. (No. 56) 692. On February 27, 1991, the Union requested reconsideration of the Authority's decision pursuant to 5 C.F.R. § 2429.17. The Authority denied reconsideration on March 15, 1991. No. 0-AR-1982, 39 F.L.R.A. (No. 106) On July 9, 1991, an arbitration award was i......
  • U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, AFL-CI
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • September 23, 1987
    ...the negotiated grievance procedure. The FLRA denied the HHS motion for reconsideration as untimely, noting that under FLRA rules (5 C.F.R. Sec. 2429.17) a motion for reconsideration is due within ten days of the FLRA decision in a particular case. This appeal followed. We have jurisdiction ......
  • U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, AFL-CI
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • April 19, 1988
    ...to Reconsider" was denied as untimely because such motions are required to be filed within 10 days after service of an FLRA order. 5 C.F.R. Sec. 2429.17. There are no extraordinary circumstances warranting this court's consideration of the above issue. HHS had three months after the Supreme......
  • N.L.R.B. v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, No. 91-1608
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • August 31, 1993
    ...to press [a] claim before the FLRA"). Given the similarity of the FLRA's and NLRB's motion for reconsideration provisions, compare 5 C.F.R. Sec. 2429.17 (1993) (FLRA) with 29 C.F.R. Sec. 102.48(d) (1992) (NLRB), these holdings should apply with equal force to FLRA proceedings. In the presen......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT