29 CFR 1605.2 - Reasonable accommodation without undue hardship as required by section 701(j) of title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Cite as29 CFR 1605.2
CurrencyCurrent through December 7, 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
69 practice notes
  • Implementation of the Nondiscrimination and Equal Opportunity Provisions of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act
    • United States
    • Federal Register January 26, 2016
    • January 26, 2016
    ...with EEOC's interpretation of Title VII.\123\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \123\ 29 CFR 1605.2(e). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Video Remote Interpreting (VRI) Service Sec. This NPRM adds the defin......
  • Federal Law Protections for Religious Liberty
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 26, 2017
    • October 26, 2017
    ...a change of job assignments or lateral transfer to a position whose schedule does not conflict with the employee's religious holidays, 29 CFR 1605.2(d)(1)(iii); a voluntary work schedule swap with another employee, id. Sec. 1065.2(d)(1)(i); or a flexible scheduling scheme that allows employ......
  • Religious Sisters of Mercy v. Azar, 011921 NDDC, 3:16-cv-00386
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 8th Circuit District of North Dakota
    • January 19, 2021
    ...religious beliefs unless doing so results in undue hardship on the employer's business. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(j); 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(c). [5] Bostock preceded the 2020 Rule's publication in the Federal Register by four [6] The parties have often treated the abor......
  • 717 F.Supp.2d 873 (D.Minn. 2010), 06-CV-4769 (PJS/JJG), Haliye v. Celestica Corp.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 8th Circuit District of Minnesota
    • June 10, 2010
    ...afternoon. It is worth noting that this seems to be the position taken in the EEOC's own guideline on reasonable accommodation. See 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(c)(2)(ii) (" when there is more than one means of accommodation which would not cause undue hardship, the employer or labor organizatio......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
59 cases
  • Religious Sisters of Mercy v. Azar, 011921 NDDC, 3:16-cv-00386
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 8th Circuit District of North Dakota
    • January 19, 2021
    ...religious beliefs unless doing so results in undue hardship on the employer's business. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(j); 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(c). [5] Bostock preceded the 2020 Rule's publication in the Federal Register by four [6] The parties have often treated the abor......
  • 717 F.Supp.2d 873 (D.Minn. 2010), 06-CV-4769 (PJS/JJG), Haliye v. Celestica Corp.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 8th Circuit District of Minnesota
    • June 10, 2010
    ...afternoon. It is worth noting that this seems to be the position taken in the EEOC's own guideline on reasonable accommodation. See 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(c)(2)(ii) (" when there is more than one means of accommodation which would not cause undue hardship, the employer or labor organizatio......
  • 978 F.Supp. 926 (D.Neb. 1997), 4 CV96-3233, Pedersen v. Casey's General Stores, Inc.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 8th Circuit District of Nebraska
    • September 29, 1997
    ...[9] As earlier noted, Casey's accepted Jury Instruction 6, and agreed that it was an accurate statement of the law. [10] See also 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2 (1997) (EEOC guidelines on discrimination because of religion; reasonable accommodation without undue hardship); 41 C.F.R. § 60-50.3 (1997) (O......
  • 623 F.Supp. 15 (E.D.N.C. 1985), 84-41-CIV-7, E.E.O.C. v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 4th Circuit Eastern District of North Carolina
    • May 17, 1985
    ...represent an unconstitutional attempt by the government to establish religion; and (3) the EEOC interpretative guideline embodied in 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(e)(1) is unconstitutionally Every appellate court which has considered the constitutionality of the "reasonable accommodation" re......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 firm's commentaries
2 books & journal articles
  • A Hobson's Choice Model for Religious Accommodation
    • United States
    • American Business Law Journal Nbr. 43-3, September 2006
    • September 1, 2006
    ...703(b)) or joint labor-management committees controlling appre[n]ticeship orother training or retraining (section 703(d)).29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(b)(3). Therefore, for ease of reading, we refer only to employers.5942 U.S.C. § 2000e(j).60The statute does couple the notion of an undue hardship wit......
  • Kim Davis and the quest for a judicial accommodation.
    • United States
    • Faulkner Law Review Vol. 7 Nbr. 1, September 2015
    • September 22, 2015
    ...of Human Res. of Or. v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990). (22) See, e.g., 42 U.S.C. [section][section] 2000e(j), 2000e-2(a), 2000e-16(a); 29 C.F.R. 1605.2; see also, Questions and Answers: Religious Accommodation in the Workplace, https://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/qanda_religion.html#fhl (Title VI......
2 provisions
  • Implementation of the Nondiscrimination and Equal Opportunity Provisions of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act
    • United States
    • Federal Register January 26, 2016
    • January 26, 2016
    ...with EEOC's interpretation of Title VII.\123\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \123\ 29 CFR 1605.2(e). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Video Remote Interpreting (VRI) Service Sec. This NPRM adds the defin......
  • Federal Law Protections for Religious Liberty
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 26, 2017
    • October 26, 2017
    ...a change of job assignments or lateral transfer to a position whose schedule does not conflict with the employee's religious holidays, 29 CFR 1605.2(d)(1)(iii); a voluntary work schedule swap with another employee, id. Sec. 1065.2(d)(1)(i); or a flexible scheduling scheme that allows employ......