24 CFR 58.47 - Re-evaluation of environmental assessments and other environmental findings

Cite as24 CFR 58.47
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Part IV
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 13, 2005
    • October 13, 2005
    ...that conducted the environmental review on the original project and re- evaluation of the environmental findings is not required under 24 CFR 58.47. This exemption is limited to contracts for the same units that previously had an environmental review completed under part In accordance with ......
  • Public and Indian housing: Project-Based Voucher Program,
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 13, 2005
    • October 13, 2005
    ...that conducted the environmental review on the original project and re- evaluation of the environmental findings is not required under 24 CFR 58.47. This exemption is limited to contracts for the same units that previously had an environmental review completed under part In accordance with ......
  • Earth Island Inst. v. Nash, No. 1:19-cv-01420-DAD-SAB
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Eastern District of California
    • April 21, 2020
    ...reviewed in the EIS trigger a re-evaluation obligation" and thus require the preparation of a SEIS. (Doc. No. 67 at 15-16) (citing 24 C.F.R. §§ 58.47, 58.52). Defendants, on the other hand, persuasively argue that plaintiffs have misread the HUD regulations in this regard. (Doc. Nos. 70 at ......
1 cases
  • Earth Island Inst. v. Nash, No. 1:19-cv-01420-DAD-SAB
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Eastern District of California
    • April 21, 2020
    ...reviewed in the EIS trigger a re-evaluation obligation" and thus require the preparation of a SEIS. (Doc. No. 67 at 15-16) (citing 24 C.F.R. §§ 58.47, 58.52). Defendants, on the other hand, persuasively argue that plaintiffs have misread the HUD regulations in this regard. (Doc. Nos. 70 at ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT