21 CFR 1020.31 - Radiographic equipment

Cite as21 CFR 1020.31
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 practice notes
  • Specifications for Medical Examinations of Underground Coal Miners
    • United States
    • Federal Register September 13, 2012
    • September 13, 2012
    ...cause large unexposed boundaries. The beam limiting device must provide rectangular collimation and must be of the type described in 21 CFR 1020.31(d), (e), (f), and (g). The use of such a device must be discernible from an examination of the (i) To ensure high quality chest radiographs: Pa......
  • Specifications for Medical Examinations of Underground Coal Miners
    • United States
    • Federal Register January 09, 2012
    • January 9, 2012
    ...of the Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors (Rev 2009). The beam limiting device must be of the type described in 21 CFR 1020.31(d), (e), (f), and Finally, we propose to remove Sec. 37.41(i)(9), which requires that each facility shall establish a formal quality assurance progra......
  • U.S. v. Hodges X-Ray, Inc., X-RA
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • April 18, 1985
    ...predicated upon the finding of the court below that x-ray equipment manufactured by the defendants 1 failed to Page 559 comply with 21 C.F.R. Sec. 1020.31(a)(1), which requires a display of exposure time on the control panel in seconds, and 21 C.F.R. Sec. 1020.31(a)(2), which mandates that ......
  • United States v. Hodges X-Ray, Inc., Civ. A. No. C 81-0610 L(A).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court of Western District of Kentucky
    • February 21, 1984
    ...states of the United States. The plaintiff alleges that thirteen of the machines sold by the Corporation failed to comply with 21 CFR § 1020.31(a)(2) by failing to terminate x-ray exposure at the preselected time The complaint alleges that twenty-two of the machines sold by the Corporation ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 cases
  • U.S. v. Hodges X-Ray, Inc., X-RA
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • April 18, 1985
    ...predicated upon the finding of the court below that x-ray equipment manufactured by the defendants 1 failed to Page 559 comply with 21 C.F.R. Sec. 1020.31(a)(1), which requires a display of exposure time on the control panel in seconds, and 21 C.F.R. Sec. 1020.31(a)(2), which mandates that ......
  • United States v. Hodges X-Ray, Inc., Civ. A. No. C 81-0610 L(A).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court of Western District of Kentucky
    • February 21, 1984
    ...states of the United States. The plaintiff alleges that thirteen of the machines sold by the Corporation failed to comply with 21 CFR § 1020.31(a)(2) by failing to terminate x-ray exposure at the preselected time The complaint alleges that twenty-two of the machines sold by the Corporation ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT