21 CFR 1306.04 - Purpose of issue of prescription
| Cite as | 21 CFR 1306.04 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
528 practice notes
-
Holiday CVS, L.L.C., d/b/a CVS/Pharmacy Nos. 219 and 5195; Decision and Order
...which revoked Dr. Lynch's registration with an effective date of January 18, 2011, based, inter alia, on findings that he violated 21 CFR 1306.04(a) by issuing controlled substance prescriptions outside of the usual course of professional practice and which lacked a legitimate medical purpo......
-
Perry County Food & Drug Decision and Order
...the course of the . . . distribution or dispensing of a controlled substance . . . a registration number which is fictitious.)''; Cf. 21 CFR 1306.04(a) (``An order purporting to be a prescription issued not in the usual course of professional treatment . . . is not a prescription within the......
-
Mireille Lalanne, M.D.; Denial of Application
...is a proper focus of ze diversion by issuing only these proceedings, while the former presents an issue for a different venue. 21 C.F.R. Sec. 1306.04(a); see Gonzales v. Oregon, 546 U.S. 243, 270 (2006) (explaining that the CSA grants the Attorney General authority to regulate the practice ......
-
Farmacia Yani; Decision and Order
...doctor who did not possess a valid DEA registration, in violation of Federal law and regulations.'' Id. (citing 21 U.S.C. 843(a)(2); 21 CFR 1306.04). The Government then alleged that Respondent's ``violations of Federal law and regulations render granting its application for a registration ......
Request a trial to view additional results
280 cases
-
U.S. v. Armstrong, No. 07-30286.
..."issued for a legitimate medical purpose by an individual practitioner acting in the usual course of his professional practice." 21 C.F.R. § 1306.04(a). The Supreme Court held in Moore, 423 U.S. at 138-43, 96 S.Ct. 335, that a registered physician could be charged and convicted under § 841 ......
-
United States v. Sabean, No. 17-1484
...2014 outside the usual course of professional medical practice and without legitimate medical purpose.1 See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) ; 21 C.F.R. § 1306.04(a). Finally, the indictment charged the defendant, in a single count, with committing health-care fraud by writing certain prescriptions me......
-
People v. Schade, No. H009896
...her professional practice." (See Stats.1982, ch. 1284, § 3, p. 4753.) The new language was taken directly from the Federal Regulations. (21 CFR 1306.04) According to the reports accompanying the 1982 assembly bill (AB 3376), one of the reasons for the changes was to bring section 11153 in l......
-
Comm'r of Corr. v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, Nos. 18622
...‘be issued for a legitimate medical purpose by an individual practitioner acting in the usual course of his professional practice.’ 21 C.F.R. § 1306.04(a) (2005).” Gonzales v. Oregon, supra, 546 U.S. at 250, 126 S.Ct. 904. 28. Although the Controlled Substances Act also authorized the attor......
Request a trial to view additional results
12 firm's commentaries
-
Pain Management or Pill Mill? Supreme Court to Weigh in on Standards for Prosecutions of Practitioners Prescribing Narcotics
...of its powerhouse white collar litigation practice. [1] United States v. Moore, 423 U.S. 122, 124 (1975). [2] 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); 21 C.F.R. § 1306.04(a). See also United States v. Chube II, 538 F.3d 693, 697–98 (7th Cir. 2008); United States v. Hurwitz, 459 F.3d 463, 475 (4th Cir. 2006);......
-
Is Marijuana “Legal” Now? The Cannabis Industry and Your Risk
...a licensed doctor or pharmacist may not legally prescribe marijuana as it does not have the legitimate medical purpose required by 21 C.F.R. § 1306.04. Federal statutes also make it illegal to conspire to traffic drugs (21 U.S.C. § 846) or to aid and abet an offense against the United State......
-
SCOTUS unanimously rejects federal convictions for opioid docs in <em>Ruan</em>, with majority stressing <em>mens rea</em> requirement
...authorized when a doctor issues it “for a legitimate medical purpose . . . acting in the usual course of his professional practice.” 21 CFR §1306.04(a) (2021). In each of these two consolidated cases, a doctor was convicted under § 841 for dispensing controlled substances not “as authorized......
-
DOJ Levels False Claims Act at Pharmacies to Combat Opioid Crisis
...is issued for “a legitimate medical purpose by an individual practitioner acting in the usual course of his professional practice.” 21 C.F.R. § 1306.04(a). Here, the Defendants allegedly dispensed prescriptions outside the usual course of professional practice and in violation of their resp......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
-
The Final Auer: How Weakening the Deference Doctrine May Impact Environmental Law
...qualify as a “legitimate medical purpose” as required by the CSA. 86 Although Ashcroft ostensibly relied on his authority to interpret 21 C.F.R. §1306.04, the fact that the regulation simply repeated ambiguous language from the statute defeated Auer deference. Ashcroft’s interpretation also......
-
Brief for the petitioners: Gonzales v. State of Oregon *.
...substances except for a "legitimate medical purpose" and "in the usual course of professional treatment." Pet. App. 5a (quoting 21 C.F.R. 1306.04). Respondents nonetheless seek to overturn the Attorney General's determination that the prescription of controlled substances, not for ordinary ......
-
A dissent from the many dissents from Attorney General Ashcroft's interpretation of the Controlled Substances Act.
...(2) Ashcroft announced that he had: determined that assisting suicide is not a "legitimate medical purpose" within the meaning of 21 CFR 1306.04 (2001), and that prescribing, dispensing, or administering federally controlled substances to assist suicide violates the Controlled Substances Ac......
-
Chevron and agency norm-entrepreneurship.
...The Attorney General was also interpreting the requirement that drugs could only be used by doctors for a "legitimate medical purpose." 21 C.F.R. 1306.04 (2005). (38.) Oregon, 126 S. Ct. at 921 (quoting Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702, 735 (1997)). (39.) Id. at 924-25. (40.) Id. at 9......
Request a trial to view additional results