29 CFR 5.1 - Purpose and scope
| Cite as | 29 CFR 5.1 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
27 practice notes
-
Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors
...subject to the DBA and that they do not apply to contracts subject only to the Davis- Bacon Related Acts, including those set forth at 29 CFR 5.1(a)(2)-(60). The Final Rule makes no change to this The DBA applies, in relevant part, to contracts to which the Federal Government is a party, fo......
-
Establishing a Minimum Wage for Contractors
...subject to the DBA itself, but do not apply to contracts subject only to the Davis-Bacon Related Acts, including those set forth at 29 CFR 5.1(a)(2)-(60). The DBA applies, in relevant part, to contracts to which the Federal Government is a party, for the construction, alteration, or repair,......
-
Establishing a Minimum Wage for Contractors
...subject to the DBA itself, but do not apply to contracts subject only to the Davis-Bacon Related Acts, including those set forth at 29 CFR 5.1(a)(2)-(60). The DBA applies, in relevant part, to contracts to which the Federal Government is a party, for the construction, alteration, or repair,......
-
Increasing the Minimum Wage for Federal Contractors
...subject to the DBA itself, but do not apply to contracts subject only to the Davis-Bacon Related Acts, including those set forth at 29 CFR 5.1(a)(2)-(60). This interpretation is consistent with the discussion of procurement contracts for construction set forth in the Department's final rule......
Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
-
621 F.2d 697 (5th Cir. 1980), 77-1581, North Georgia Bldg. and Const. Trades Council v. Goldschmidt
...of wage rates are contained in Part 1 of the subtitle, and the Airport and Airway Development Act, incorporated by reference in 29 C.F.R. § 5.1 (1976), was subsequently listed therein. The question raised by North Georgia in its January 5, 1977 presentation to the national office of the Wag......
-
755 F.2d 1028 (3rd Cir. 1985), 84-3363, Glenn Elec. Co. Inc. v. Donovan
...and Procedures" and lists the 60-odd federal statutes which are euphemistically termed the "Related Acts" in 29 C.F.R. Sec. 5.1(a) (1983). As the Secretary notes, the enumerated provisions, of which one is the U.S. Housing Act, are deemed "related" in that they conc......
-
290 F.2d 368 (D.C. Cir. 1961), 16044, Copper Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Campbell
...(1958), 5 U.S.C.A. § 133z-4. [8] 29C.F.R. § 5.6(b) (Supp.1961). The acts to which the debarment provision is applicable are set outin 29 C.F.R. § 5.1 [9] 322 U.S. at page 404, 64 S.Ct. at page 1100. [10] The emergency wartime character of the program involved in Steuart & Bro. was not a......
-
997 F.Supp. 196 (D. Puerto Rico 1998), Civ. 96-1696, Koren v. Martin Marietta Services, Inc.
...or. Given the similarity of the regulatory schemes for enforcing both the SCA and the CWHSSA, compare 29 C.F.R. §§ 4.101-4.191 with 29 C.F.R. §§ 5.1-5.32 and see generally 29 C.F.R. §§ 6.1-6.57, the Court is relatively certain that such analysis would lead to the conclusion that the CWHSSA ......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 provisions
-
Increasing the Minimum Wage for Federal Contractors
...subject to the DBA itself, but do not apply to contracts subject only to the Davis-Bacon Related Acts, including those set forth at 29 CFR 5.1(a)(2)-(60). This interpretation is consistent with the discussion of procurement contracts for construction set forth in the Department's final rule......
-
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Positive Law Codification of Title 41
...of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards statute or the Copeland (Anti- Kickback) Act, or any of the applicable statutes listed in 29 CFR 5.1 other than the Construction Wage Rate Requirements statute, or has committed violations of the Construction Wage Rate Requirements statute tha......
-
Increasing the Minimum Wage for Federal Contractors
...subject to the DBA itself, but do not apply to contracts subject only to the Davis-Bacon Related Acts, including those set forth at 29 CFR 5.1(a)(2)-(60). This interpretation is consistent with the discussion of procurement contracts for construction set forth in the Department's final rule......
-
Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors
...subject to the DBA and that they do not apply to contracts subject only to the Davis-Bacon Related Acts, including those set forth at 29 CFR 5.1(a)(2)-(60). The DBA applies, in relevant part, to contracts to which the Federal Government is a party, for the construction, alteration, or repai......
Request a trial to view additional results