28 CFR 16.21 - Purpose and scope

Cite as28 CFR 16.21
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
164 practice notes
  • F.B.I. v. Superior Court of Cal., No. C-07-01876 PJH (JCS).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Northern District of California
    • August 22, 2007
    ...the DOJ promulgated its own internal regulations governing the disclosure of information by its employees in legal proceedings in 28 C.F.R. §§ 16.21, et seq. Smith, 159 F.3d at 878. Specifically, 28 C.F.R. § 16.22 establishes the "[g]eneral prohibition of production or disclosure in Federal......
  • Owens v. Republic of Sudan, No. CIV.A. 01-2244(JDB).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • March 29, 2005
    ...from existing or former public officials that they obtained in the course of their employment. See 22 C.F.R. §§ 172.1-172.9; 28 C.F.R. §§ 16.21-16.29. To date, plaintiffs have failed to come forward with any information suggesting that they have even attempted to comply with the regulations......
  • People v. Aguilera, D075381
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • June 17, 2020
    ...340 U.S. 462, 71 S.Ct. 416, 95 L.Ed. 417 ( Touhy ), he would have to comply with federal regulations to make a proper request. (See 28 C.F.R. § 16.21 et seq. ) The attorney wrote that 264 Cal.Rptr.3d 445 defense counsel was also free to submit a request.2 Separately, Sherman served two subp......
  • People v. Santos, GT-D
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • May 15, 1975
    ...reasonable cause to believe a parole violation had occurred. The federal government has lawfully withheld its privileged information (28 C.F.R. §§ 16.21--16.26; Matter of Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462, 71 S.Ct. 416, 95 L.Ed. 417), and no cognizable constitutional violation has been worked Th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
161 cases
  • F.B.I. v. Superior Court of Cal., No. C-07-01876 PJH (JCS).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Northern District of California
    • August 22, 2007
    ...the DOJ promulgated its own internal regulations governing the disclosure of information by its employees in legal proceedings in 28 C.F.R. §§ 16.21, et seq. Smith, 159 F.3d at 878. Specifically, 28 C.F.R. § 16.22 establishes the "[g]eneral prohibition of production or disclosure in Federal......
  • Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. U.S., No. 06-2449.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (1st Circuit)
    • June 15, 2007
    ...v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 43 F.3d 312, 316 (7th Cir.1994)(explaining that a subpoena initiates the administrative process); see also 28 C.F.R. § 16.21.6 In applying the arbitrary and capricious standard of review, we are deferential to the agency's decision. In general, an agency's "choice ......
  • Owens v. Republic Sudan, No. 14-5105
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • July 28, 2017
    ...Touhy regulations for obtaining permission to solicit testimony from former government officials, see 22 C.F.R. §§ 172.1 -172.9 ; 28 C.F.R. §§ 16.21 -16.29. The agencies also noted that Sudan had not properly sought approval to take the declarations.Sudan then ceased participating in the li......
  • Smith v. Cromer, No. 97-2192
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • October 22, 1998
    ...and regulations promulgated by the Department of Justice regarding the release of document and provision of testimony in court actions. 28 C.F.R. § 16.21 et seq. Appellant Cromer (hereinafter, "Cromer") served as a DEA confidential informant ("CI") from June 1994 through November 1995, unti......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Court Requires DOJ To Disclose Audio Recordings Obtained In Criminal Antitrust Investigation To Civil Plaintiffs
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • May 18, 2011
    ...privilege and work product contentions. First, Judge Borman rejected DOJ's argument that its internal subpoena control regulations (28 C.F.R. §§ 16.21-29) immunized its refusal to produce the requested tapes. The Sixth Circuit has held that the statute providing DOJ authority to promulgate ......
  • Court Requires DOJ to Disclose Audio Recordings
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • May 17, 2011
    ...privilege and work product contentions. First, Judge Borman rejected DOJ’s argument that its internal subpoena control regulations (28 C.F.R. §§ 16.21-29) immunized its refusal to produce the requested tapes. The Sixth Circuit has held that the statute providing DOJ authority to promulgate ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT