28 C.F.R. 35.101 - Purpose and broad coverage
| Cite as | 28 C.F.R. 35.101 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
61 practice notes
-
Swanston v. City of Plano, Tex., Civil Action 4:19-cv-412
...courts generally interpret the ADA broadly, Mancini v. City of Providence ex rel. Lombardi, 909 F.3d 32, 40 (1st Cir. 2018). See 28 C.F.R. § 35.101(b). Three, similar theories of liability exist under the FHA and ADA, and, with one exception, [5]Plaintiffs plead each here: (1) disparate tre......
-
Ability Center, Toledo v. City of Sandusky, No. 03-3277.
...curb ramps. Id. § 35.151(e). Section 35.151 is part of a broader regulatory scheme that aims to effectuate § 202 of the ADA. See 28 C.F.R. § 35.101. The scheme makes explicit that "no qualified individual with a disability shall, because a public entity's facilities are inaccessible to or u......
-
Schlosser v. Droughn, 3:19-cv-1445 (SRU)
...et seq., 2000d-2, 2000d-7; 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 245, 1001, 1341; white collar crimes; 29 U.S.C. § 794; 45 C.F.R. Part 85 et seq.; 28 C.F.R. Part 35 et seq.; and additionally brings state law claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress. I. Standard of Review Although Federal Ru......
-
Beno v. Shalala, No. Civ. S-92-2135-DFL.
...of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity." 42 U.S.C. § 12132. Implementing regulations, codified at 28 C.F.R. §§ 35.101-35.190, bar the states from excluding qualified disabled21 persons from the benefits of any service, program or activity. 28 C.F.R. § 35.13......
Request a trial to view additional results
59 cases
-
Swanston v. City of Plano, Tex., Civil Action 4:19-cv-412
...courts generally interpret the ADA broadly, Mancini v. City of Providence ex rel. Lombardi, 909 F.3d 32, 40 (1st Cir. 2018). See 28 C.F.R. § 35.101(b). Three, similar theories of liability exist under the FHA and ADA, and, with one exception, [5]Plaintiffs plead each here: (1) disparate tre......
-
Beno v. Shalala, No. Civ. S-92-2135-DFL.
...of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity." 42 U.S.C. § 12132. Implementing regulations, codified at 28 C.F.R. §§ 35.101-35.190, bar the states from excluding qualified disabled21 persons from the benefits of any service, program or activity. 28 C.F.R. § 35.13......
-
Fetto v. Sergi, No. CIV.A.3:94CV771(CFD).
...Southeastern Comm. College v. Davis, 442 U.S. 397, 410, 99 S.Ct. 2361, 60 L.Ed.2d 980 (1979); 45 C.F.R. § 84.1 (Rehabilitation Act); 28 C.F.R. § 35.101(ADA). In contrast, the plaintiff asks the Court to compare his treatment to that of certain other disabled individuals-those who receive se......
-
Schlosser v. Droughn, 3:19-cv-1445 (SRU)
...et seq., 2000d-2, 2000d-7; 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 245, 1001, 1341; white collar crimes; 29 U.S.C. § 794; 45 C.F.R. Part 85 et seq.; 28 C.F.R. Part 35 et seq.; and additionally brings state law claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress. I. Standard of Review Although Federal Ru......
Request a trial to view additional results