49 C.F.R. §172.800 - Purpose and applicability
| Cite as | 49 C.F.R. §172.800 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Multistar Indus., Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Transp.
...(using a physically unqualified driver), identified in the compliance report as Violation 20. 5. The agency found violations of 49 C.F.R. § 172.800(b) (offering or transporting hazardous materials without a security plan), identified as Violation 3 in the compliance report; 49 C.F.R. § 177.......
-
Fleury v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.
...hazardous materials to develop and follow a "transportation security plan" that fulfills certain requirements, 528 F.Supp.3d 891 49 C.F.R. § 172.800(b), but the regulations also allow entities to fulfill this obligation by following other "regulations, standards, protocols, or guidelines" i......
-
Csx Transp., Inc. v. Williams, 05-5131.
...carriers (as well as motor carriers) are required to develop and implement security plans for transporting hazardous materials. See 49 C.F.R. § 172.800-04. The security plans must address personnel security (such as background checks), unauthorized access to hazardous materials, and, most i......
-
Fleury v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.
...shipping certain hazardous materials to develop and follow a "transportation security plan" that fulfills certain requirements, 49 C.F.R. § 172.800(b), but the regulations also allow entities to fulfill this obligation by following other "regulations, standards, protocols, or guidelines" is......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
-
Hazardous Material Transportation/California Meal/Rest Break Requirements: U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Grants Preemption Petition
...further determined that the California requirements are preempted as to motor carriers who are required to file a security plan under 49 C.F.R. §172.800, and who have filed security plans requiring constant attendance of hazardous materials. This is based on the agency’s view that the Calif......
-
DOT Preempts California Meal And Rest Breaks Laws Under Federal Hazmat Regulations
...171.1. See Federal Register, Vol. 83, No. 184 (Sept. 21, 2018) at 47961-47969. See 49 C.F.R. § 177.800(d). See 49 C.F.R. § 397.5. See 49 C.F.R. § 172.800-172.802. See 49 C.F.R. § The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice shou......
-
DOT Preempts California Meal and Rest Breaks Laws Under Federal Hazmat Regulations
...5 See Federal Register, Vol. 83, No. 184 (Sept. 21, 2018) at 47961-47969. 6 See 49 C.F.R. § 177.800(d). 7 See 49 C.F.R. § 397.5. 8 See 49 C.F.R. § 172.800-172.802. 9 See 49 C.F.R. § 107.211(a). Richard RahmKai-Ching Cha...
-
U.S. DOT Emergency Order Impacts Crude Oil Testing, Rail Shipping Requirements
...to retain records of that testing.” 5 HMR provisions governing testing and classification are found at 49 C.F.R. Parts 172 and 173. 6 49 C.F.R. § 172.800(b). Joshua BelcherAhren Tryon function JDS_LoadEvent(fu...
1 books & journal articles
-
All Aboard! Making the Case For a Comprehensive Rerouting Policy to Reduce the Vulnerability of Hazardous Railcargoes to Terrorist Attack
...to the transportation of hazardous materials' by 'motor vehicle, railcar, or freight container.'" Moore, supra note 62, at 774 (citing 49 C.F.R. § 172.800 66 Moore, supra note 62, at 774 (quoting 68 Fed. Reg. at 14,517) ("The security plan, at a minimum, must include three elements: (1) per......