42 C.F.R. §431.1 - Purpose
| Cite as | 42 C.F.R. §431.1 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
Rolland v. Cellucci, Civ.A. 98-30208-KPN.
...to focus accountability for plan operation, Hillburn by Hillburn v. Maher, 795 F.2d 252, 261 (2d Cir.1986); 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(5); 42 C.F.R. §§ 431.1 and 431.10, it strains reason to conclude here that it is only DMA which may be held responsible as a matter of law for failures necessaril......
-
Harris v. James, CV-94-A-1422-N.
...has provided which methods of administration are necessary for the proper and efficient operation of the plan. 883 F. Supp. 1521 See, 42 C.F.R. §§ 431.1 et seq. This part of the Code of Federal establishes State plan requirements for the designation, organization, and general administrative......
-
Rcj Medical Services, Inc. v. Bonta', B143160.
...to focus accountability for plan operation, Hillburn by Hillburn v. Maker, 795 F.2d 252, 261 (2d Cir.1986); 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(5); 42 C.F.R. §§ 431.1 and 431.10. . . ." In Sobky v. Smoley, supra, 855 F.Supp. at page 1145, Judge David F. Levi wrote, "The legislative history of the 1965 Med......
-
Cal. Hosp. Ass'n v. Maxwell–jolly, Civ No. 10–3465 FCD/EFB.
...that render services to Medi–Cal beneficiaries in compliance with the State Plan and with federal and state laws and regulations. 42 C.F.R. §§ 431.1, 431.10. In its capacity as administrator of the state Medi–Cal plan, DHCS determined that the freeze complied with federal Medicaid law and b......
Request a trial to view additional results