33 CFR 329.1 - Purpose
| Cite as | 33 CFR 329.1 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
The Navigable Waters Protection Rule: Definition of “Waters of the United States”
...water of the United States'' is a term of art used to refer to waters subject to federal jurisdiction under the RHA. See, e.g., 33 CFR 329.1. The term is not synonymous with the phrase ``waters of the United States'' under the CWA, see id., and the general term ``navigable waters'' has diff......
-
Loving v. Alexander, Civ. A. No. 79-0254.
...of 33 C.F.R. 329.14(b).2 This determination was based on the study prepared by Knapp and states that, under the standards set out in 33 C.F.R. §§ 329.1 et seq.,3 the Jackson River is a 548 F. Supp. 1083 navigable water of the United States from its mouth to its confluence with Back Creek at......
-
Revised Definition of “Waters of the United States”
...water of the United States'' is a term of art used to refer to waters subject to federal jurisdiction under the RHA. See, e.g., 33 CFR 329.1. The term is not synonymous with the phrase ``waters of the United States'' under the CWA, see id., and the general term ``navigable waters'' has diff......
-
Moscheo v. Polk County, No. E2008-01969-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. App. 9/2/2009), No. E2008-01969-COA-R3-CV.
...of the jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers and in answering inquiries concerning "navigable waters of the United States." . . . 33 C.F.R. §329.1. As this case involves an inquiry concerning a waterway apparently under the jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers, Moscheo argues the definit......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Loving v. Alexander, Civ. A. No. 79-0254.
...of 33 C.F.R. 329.14(b).2 This determination was based on the study prepared by Knapp and states that, under the standards set out in 33 C.F.R. §§ 329.1 et seq.,3 the Jackson River is a 548 F. Supp. 1083 navigable water of the United States from its mouth to its confluence with Back Creek at......
-
Moscheo v. Polk County, No. E2008-01969-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. App. 9/2/2009), No. E2008-01969-COA-R3-CV.
...of the jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers and in answering inquiries concerning "navigable waters of the United States." . . . 33 C.F.R. §329.1. As this case involves an inquiry concerning a waterway apparently under the jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers, Moscheo argues the definit......
-
U.S. v. Newdunn Associates, Nos. CIV.A. 2:01CV508, CIV.A. 4:01CV86.
...also clearly states that the definition for "navigable waters" "does not apply to authorities Page 760 under the Clean Water Act ..." 33 C.F.R. § 329.1(1986). Again, there is no such distinction in the 1974 16. The 1986 regulations define the term "waters of the United States,"7 which it st......
-
U.S. v. Rgm Corp., No. Civ.A. 2:01CV719.
...(1986). It also clearly states that the definition for "navigable waters" "does not apply to authorities under the Clean Water Act ..." 33 C.F.R. § 329.1(1986). Again, there is no such distinction in the 1974 The 1986 regulations define the term "waters of the United States," which it state......
Request a trial to view additional results