33 CFR 155.5010 - Purpose

Cite as33 CFR 155.5010
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Nontank Vessel Response Plans and Other Response Plan Requirements
    • United States
    • Federal Register September 30, 2013
    • September 30, 2013
    ...waters of the United States. Overview of Rule This rule, which adds new 33 CFR part 155, subpart J, Nontank Vessel Response Plans (33 CFR 155.5010-155.5075) and revises portions of 33 CFR parts 151, 155 and 160, specifies the content of a vessel response plan (VRP), including the requiremen......
  • Donjon-Smit, LLC v. Schultz, No. 2:20-CV-011
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court (Southern District of Georgia)
    • March 24, 2020
    ...Response Plan ("NTVRP") in place in the event of a "worst case discharge or substantial threat of discharge." 33 C.F.R. § 155.5010. NTVRP regulations require owners to pre-contract with prevention and clean-up providers so that discharge responders react quickly and &quo......
  • Donjon-SMIT, LLC v. Schultz, No. 2:20-CV-011
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court (Southern District of Georgia)
    • April 3, 2020
    ...to discharges and threats of discharge quickly and "without the need for contract negotiations during an actual emergency." 33 C.F.R. § 155.5010; 33 U.S.C. § 1321(j)(5)(D) (providing for response plan requirements); Salvage and Marine Firefighting Requirements; Vessel Response Pla......
2 cases
  • Donjon-Smit, LLC v. Schultz, No. 2:20-CV-011
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court (Southern District of Georgia)
    • March 24, 2020
    ...Response Plan ("NTVRP") in place in the event of a "worst case discharge or substantial threat of discharge." 33 C.F.R. § 155.5010. NTVRP regulations require owners to pre-contract with prevention and clean-up providers so that discharge responders react quickly and &quo......
  • Donjon-SMIT, LLC v. Schultz, No. 2:20-CV-011
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court (Southern District of Georgia)
    • April 3, 2020
    ...to discharges and threats of discharge quickly and "without the need for contract negotiations during an actual emergency." 33 C.F.R. § 155.5010; 33 U.S.C. § 1321(j)(5)(D) (providing for response plan requirements); Salvage and Marine Firefighting Requirements; Vessel Response Pla......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT