6 CFR 27.100 - Purpose

Cite as6 CFR 27.100
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • Chemical facility anti-terrorism standards,
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 28, 2006
    • December 28, 2006
    ...by the Secretary to be potentially dangerous or that meets other risk-related criterion identified by the Department.'' See proposed 6 CFR 27.100. We invite comment specifically on this interpretation or any alternative definitions of the term ``chemical Of course, the term ``chemical facil......
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 28, 2006
    • December 28, 2006
    ...by the Secretary to be potentially dangerous or that meets other risk-related criterion identified by the Department.'' See proposed 6 CFR 27.100. We invite comment specifically on this interpretation or any alternative definitions of the term ``chemical Of course, the term ``chemical facil......
  • Greenpeace, Inc. v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., Civil Action No. 17–479 (TJK)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • May 1, 2018
    ...order to reduce the risk from terrorist attacks at the chemical facilities 311 F.Supp.3d 128it regulates. See 6 U.S.C. § 622(a)(2)(B) ; 6 C.F.R. § 27.100. "[S]teps by law enforcement officers to prevent terrorism surely fulfill ‘law enforcement purposes.’ " PEER , 740 F.3d at 203 (quoting M......
  • Ryan v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury, 20-149
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana (US)
    • November 18, 2020
    ...Tyler. That "security emergency" is that Sasol could no longer comply with both the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) 6 CFR § 27.100, et seq . and the consent judgment's requirement of allowing the Meyers access through Gate 5. Sasol's planned commissioning and start-up act......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
  • Greenpeace, Inc. v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., Civil Action No. 17–479 (TJK)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • May 1, 2018
    ...order to reduce the risk from terrorist attacks at the chemical facilities 311 F.Supp.3d 128it regulates. See 6 U.S.C. § 622(a)(2)(B) ; 6 C.F.R. § 27.100. "[S]teps by law enforcement officers to prevent terrorism surely fulfill ‘law enforcement purposes.’ " PEER , 740 F.3d at 203 (quoting M......
  • Ryan v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury, 20-149
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana (US)
    • November 18, 2020
    ...Tyler. That "security emergency" is that Sasol could no longer comply with both the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) 6 CFR § 27.100, et seq . and the consent judgment's requirement of allowing the Meyers access through Gate 5. Sasol's planned commissioning and start-up act......
  • Witschger v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co., Case No. 1:11-cv-814-HJW
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. Southern District of Ohio
    • June 3, 2013
    ...assessments and the development and implementation of site security plans for chemical facilities." Pub.L. No. 109-295, § 550(a). See 6 C.F.R. § 27.100 et seq. ("The purpose of this Part [the CFATS] is to enhance the security of our Nation by furthering the mission of the Department as prov......
3 provisions
  • Chemical facility anti-terrorism standards,
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 28, 2006
    • December 28, 2006
    ...by the Secretary to be potentially dangerous or that meets other risk-related criterion identified by the Department.'' See proposed 6 CFR 27.100. We invite comment specifically on this interpretation or any alternative definitions of the term ``chemical Of course, the term ``chemical facil......
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 28, 2006
    • December 28, 2006
    ...by the Secretary to be potentially dangerous or that meets other risk-related criterion identified by the Department.'' See proposed 6 CFR 27.100. We invite comment specifically on this interpretation or any alternative definitions of the term ``chemical Of course, the term ``chemical facil......
  • Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards
    • United States
    • Federal Register August 18, 2014
    • August 18, 2014
    ...and review all comments, please identify the relevant provision of 6 CFR part 27 that relates to the specific comment provided (e.g., 6 CFR 27.100). If the commenter's suggestion is on a topic that is not covered by the current regulation, please note that in the Written comments may be sub......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT