40 C.F.R. §152.102 - Publication

Cite as40 C.F.R. §152.102
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • Ellis v. Housenger, Case No. 13-cv-01266-MMC.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Northern District of California
    • May 8, 2017
    ...entail a changed use pattern," see id., which alternative pertains when the application "proposes a new use" for the pesticide, see 40 C.F.R. § 152.102. When it publishes such a notice in the Federal Register, the EPA must "provide for a period of 30 days in which any Federal agency or any ......
  • Wildlife v. Jackson, Civil Action No. 09-1814 (ESH)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • June 14, 2011
    ...of receipt" in the Federal Register and must publish notice and respond to public comments when an application proposes a "new use." 40 C.F.R. § 152.102. A new use is one that would "result in a significant increase in the level of exposure, or a change in the route of exposure, to the acti......
  • Defenders of Wildlife v. Jackson, Civil Action No. 09–1814 (ESH).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • June 14, 2011
    ...of receipt” in the Federal Register and must publish notice and respond to public comments when an application proposes a “new use.” 40 C.F.R. § 152.102. A new use is one that would “result in a significant increase in the level of exposure, or a change in the route of exposure, to the acti......
  • Ctr. for Food Safety v. Regan, 19-72109
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • December 21, 2022
    ...comment period, id. , and "respond to comments received on the notice of application" when it notifies the public of the registration, 40 C.F.R. § 152.102.Before it can register a pesticide, EPA must conduct a "cost-benefit analysis to ensure that there is no unreasonable risk created for p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT