36 C.F.R. 219.16 - Public notifications

Cite as36 C.F.R. 219.16
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
44 practice notes
  • Update to the Regulations Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
    • United States
    • Council On Environmental Quality
    • Invalid date
    ...or otherwise identify circumstances for when to prepare a programmatic EIS. See, e.g., National Forest Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1604(g); 36 CFR 219.16. CEQ makes these changes in the final rule, and reorganizes proposed paragraphs (c) and (d) to be paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) since these par......
  • Cabinets v. U.S. Dep't of Agric., CV 16-53-M-DWM (Consolidated with Case No. CV 16-56-M-DWM).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Montana)
    • May 30, 2017
    ...Plan were suspended for Project); 36 C.F.R. § 219.15(c)(3), (4), and that such an adjustment would be subject to NFMA and NEPA, 36 C.F.R. § 219.16(b). That has not happened for the provisions of the Forest Plan addressed...
  • Citizens for Environmental Quality v. US, Civ. A. No. 87-F-1714.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. United States District Court of Colorado
    • August 24, 1989
    ...4. Designation of land suitable for timber production and the establishment of allowable timber sale quality (36 C.F.R. §§ 219.14 and 219.16); 5. Nonwilderness multiple-use allocations for those roadless areas that were reviewed under 36 C.F.R. § 219.17 and not recommended for wilderness 73......
  • Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 09, 2000
    • November 9, 2000
    ...October 5, 1999, the Forest Service published a proposed rule (64 FR 54074) to revise the Land and Resource Management Planning rule at 36 CFR part 219. The existing planning rule was adopted on September 30, 1982 (47 FR 43026) and amended in part on June 24, 1983, (48 FR 29122), and Septem......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
  • Cabinets v. U.S. Dep't of Agric., CV 16-53-M-DWM (Consolidated with Case No. CV 16-56-M-DWM).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Montana)
    • May 30, 2017
    ...Plan were suspended for Project); 36 C.F.R. § 219.15(c)(3), (4), and that such an adjustment would be subject to NFMA and NEPA, 36 C.F.R. § 219.16(b). That has not happened for the provisions of the Forest Plan addressed...
  • Citizens for Environmental Quality v. US, Civ. A. No. 87-F-1714.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. United States District Court of Colorado
    • August 24, 1989
    ...4. Designation of land suitable for timber production and the establishment of allowable timber sale quality (36 C.F.R. §§ 219.14 and 219.16); 5. Nonwilderness multiple-use allocations for those roadless areas that were reviewed under 36 C.F.R. § 219.17 and not recommended for wilderness 73......
  • Forest Guardians v. Forsgren, No. 05-2181.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • February 23, 2007
    ...document or set of documents that integrates and displays information relevant to management of a unit of the National Forest System." 36 C.F.R. § 219.16. LRMPs developed pursuant to the NFMA and Subpart A of the generally contain desired conditions, objectives, and guidance for project and......
  • Coalition for Sustainable Res. v. U.S. Forest Serv, No. 98-CV-174-B.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. District of Wyoming
    • May 13, 1999
    ...for timber production, see 16 U.S.C. § 1604(k) (1994), and to establish ASQ requirements for a forest over the life of a plan. See 36 C.F.R. § 219.16 (1998). These forest plans are revised after a ten to fifteen-year period. See 16 U.S.C. § 1604(f)(5) The Medicine Bow Forest Plan1 expressly......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Advising Noah: A Legal Analysis of Assisted Migration
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter Nbr. 39-5, May 2009
    • May 1, 2009
    ...with multiple use management, and do not result in the introduction of invasive species. 84. 36 C.F.R. §219.10(b) (2008). 85. 36 C.F.R. §219.16 (2008). 86. he NFMA (16 U.S.C. §1604(e) (2008)) as well as the regulations (36 C.F.R. §219.12(a)(1) (2008)) only broadly state that suitable multip......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT