36 C.F.R. 219.16 - Public notifications
| Cite as | 36 C.F.R. 219.16 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
45 practice notes
-
Update to the Regulations Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
...or otherwise identify circumstances for when to prepare a programmatic EIS. See, e.g., National Forest Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1604(g); 36 CFR 219.16. CEQ makes these changes in the final rule, and reorganizes proposed paragraphs (c) and (d) to be paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) since these par......
-
Cabinets v. U.S. Dep't of Agric., CV 16-53-M-DWM (Consolidated with Case No. CV 16-56-M-DWM).
...Plan were suspended for Project); 36 C.F.R. § 219.15(c)(3), (4), and that such an adjustment would be subject to NFMA and NEPA, 36 C.F.R. § 219.16(b). That has not happened for the provisions of the Forest Plan addressed...
-
Citizens for Environmental Quality v. US, Civ. A. No. 87-F-1714.
...4. Designation of land suitable for timber production and the establishment of allowable timber sale quality (36 C.F.R. §§ 219.14 and 219.16); 5. Nonwilderness multiple-use allocations for those roadless areas that were reviewed under 36 C.F.R. § 219.17 and not recommended for wilderness 73......
-
Advising Noah: A Legal Analysis of Assisted Migration
...with multiple use management, and do not result in the introduction of invasive species. 84. 36 C.F.R. §219.10(b) (2008). 85. 36 C.F.R. §219.16 (2008). 86. he NFMA (16 U.S.C. §1604(e) (2008)) as well as the regulations (36 C.F.R. §219.12(a)(1) (2008)) only broadly state that suitable multip......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
-
Cabinets v. U.S. Dep't of Agric., CV 16-53-M-DWM (Consolidated with Case No. CV 16-56-M-DWM).
...Plan were suspended for Project); 36 C.F.R. § 219.15(c)(3), (4), and that such an adjustment would be subject to NFMA and NEPA, 36 C.F.R. § 219.16(b). That has not happened for the provisions of the Forest Plan addressed...
-
Citizens for Environmental Quality v. US, Civ. A. No. 87-F-1714.
...4. Designation of land suitable for timber production and the establishment of allowable timber sale quality (36 C.F.R. §§ 219.14 and 219.16); 5. Nonwilderness multiple-use allocations for those roadless areas that were reviewed under 36 C.F.R. § 219.17 and not recommended for wilderness 73......
-
Forest Guardians v. Forsgren, No. 05-2181.
...document or set of documents that integrates and displays information relevant to management of a unit of the National Forest System." 36 C.F.R. § 219.16. LRMPs developed pursuant to the NFMA and Subpart A of the generally contain desired conditions, objectives, and guidance for project and......
-
Coalition for Sustainable Res. v. U.S. Forest Serv, No. 98-CV-174-B.
...for timber production, see 16 U.S.C. § 1604(k) (1994), and to establish ASQ requirements for a forest over the life of a plan. See 36 C.F.R. § 219.16 (1998). These forest plans are revised after a ten to fifteen-year period. See 16 U.S.C. § 1604(f)(5) The Medicine Bow Forest Plan1 expressly......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Advising Noah: A Legal Analysis of Assisted Migration
...with multiple use management, and do not result in the introduction of invasive species. 84. 36 C.F.R. §219.10(b) (2008). 85. 36 C.F.R. §219.16 (2008). 86. he NFMA (16 U.S.C. §1604(e) (2008)) as well as the regulations (36 C.F.R. §219.12(a)(1) (2008)) only broadly state that suitable multip......