18 C.F.R. §380.4 - Projects or actions categorically excluded
| Cite as | 18 C.F.R. §380.4 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 cases
-
Northeast Utilities Service Co. v. F.E.R.C., s. 92-1165
...acquisition or disposition of property, merger, interlocking directorates, jurisdictional determinations and accounting orders. 18 C.F.R. § 380.4(a)(16). An agency need not issue a "finding of no significant impact" in cases concerning matters that fall into a categorical exclusion. 40 C.F.......
-
Town of Norwood MA v. Fed'l Energy Reg. Comm'n
...not likely to have a significant environmental impact or to require a NEPA environmental impact statement or smaller scale assessment. 18 C.F.R. § 380.4(a)(8), (16). If there was reason here for a different outcome, Northeast Center has not provided A FERC action that otherwise falls within......
-
In re Candor
...of 1969, Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897 (Dec. 17, 1987), FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 30,783 (1987) (cross-referenced at 41 FERC ¶ 61,284). [52] 18 CFR 380.4(a)(5) and (a)(2)(ii). [53] 5 U.S.C. 601-12. [1] 18 C.F.R. § 35.41(b). [2] Duty of Candor, 180 FERC ¶ 61,052, at proposed §1d.1 (2022) (NOPR). [3......
-
The Grand Council of the Crees v. Fed. Energy Comm'n., 98-1280
...that FERC violated NEPA by refusing to perform an environmental assessment and, in the alternative, that even if FERC's regulation, 18 CFR § 380.4(a)(15) (1996), provides a valid categorical exclusion for all electric rate filings pursuant to FPA § 205, the agency cannot rely on this justif......
Request a trial to view additional results