7 CFR 1033.13 - Producer milk

Cite as7 CFR 1033.13
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • White Eagle Co-Op. Ass'n v. Conner, No. 07-3545.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • January 12, 2009
    ..."producer milk" in order to identify the producers and the farm milk that may share in the market's blend price. See 7 C.F.R. §§ 1033.12, 1033.13. These rules are termed collectively "pooling standards." These standards determine whether a particular milk supply should be included in the ca......
  • White Eagle Co-Op. Ass'n v. Johanns, Case No. 3:05-CV-0620-AS.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. United States District Court of Northern District of Indiana
    • October 28, 2005
    ...rather than to handler pool plants without being disqualified from the pool and thus from entitlement to the minimum blend price. See 7 C.F.R. § 1033.13). According to the defendants, the diversion amendment was proposed because the "excessive diversions of milk by a few produces to non-poo......
2 cases
  • White Eagle Co-Op. Ass'n v. Conner, No. 07-3545.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • January 12, 2009
    ..."producer milk" in order to identify the producers and the farm milk that may share in the market's blend price. See 7 C.F.R. §§ 1033.12, 1033.13. These rules are termed collectively "pooling standards." These standards determine whether a particular milk supply should be included in the ca......
  • White Eagle Co-Op. Ass'n v. Johanns, Case No. 3:05-CV-0620-AS.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. United States District Court of Northern District of Indiana
    • October 28, 2005
    ...rather than to handler pool plants without being disqualified from the pool and thus from entitlement to the minimum blend price. See 7 C.F.R. § 1033.13). According to the defendants, the diversion amendment was proposed because the "excessive diversions of milk by a few produces to non-poo......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT