Processing of prior art citations during an Inter Partes reexamination proceeding
Currency | Current through May 31, 2023 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
96 cases
-
Abbott Labs. v. Cordis Corp.
...before the Board. The PTO's regulations for inter partes reexaminations make no provision for either party to take depositions. See37 C.F.R. §§ 1.902–.997 (2005). The PTO's regulations indeed specifically exclude appeals of inter partes reexaminations (the only stage of the reexamination oc......
-
Cooper Technologies Co. v. Dudas, 2008-1130.
...patents are subject to such proceedings." Id. at 76,763. In response to the comment, the Patent Office amended the title of Subpart H (37 C.F.R. §§ 1.902 to 1.997), to add the parenthetical notation "Applicable to any Patent that Issues from an Original Application Filed in the United State......
-
Life Technologies Corp. v. 454 Life Sciences Corp., Appeal 2015-000178
...A request for inter partes reexamination of the '690 patent was filed Sept. 15, 2011. Request under 35 U.S.C. §§ 311-318 (pre-AIA) and 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.902-1.997 (pre-AIA) ("Request"). The Examiner determined that claims 1-9, 20-28, 39-47, and 57-65 are unpatentable. Right of Appeal Notice ("......
-
NEC Corporation and Sumitomo Chemical Co. Ltd. v. Entegris, Inc.
...benefit of Japanese Application 11/124326, filed April 30, 1999. This inter partes reexamination was conducted under the regulations of 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.902-1.997 (effective Feb. 5, 2001), and 37 C.F.R. §§ 41.61-41.81 (effective September 13, 2004). The version of the regulations does not aff......
Request a trial to view additional results