37 CFR 1.902 - Processing of prior art citations during an Inter Partes reexamination proceeding
| Cite as | 37 CFR 1.902 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
109 practice notes
-
Changes to Implement Inter Partes Review Proceedings, Post-Grant Review Proceedings, and Transitional Program for Covered Business Method Patents
...by an examiner with a right of appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and allow for limited participation by third parties. 37 CFR 1.902-1.997 provide for inter partes reexamination of patents. Similar to ex parte reexamination, inter partes reexamination provides a procedure in which......
-
Patent cases: American Inventors Protection Act; implementation Inter Partes reexamination proceedings, optional,
...by 37 CFR 1.501-1.570. The proposed rules for optional inter partes reexaminations under Chapter 31 of 35 U.S.C. have been numbered 37 CFR 1.902-1.997. The effective date of the statute with respect to the optional inter partes reexamination proceedings as well as to the existing ex parte r......
-
Rules of Practice for Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and Judicial Review of Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decisions
...by an examiner with a right of appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and allow for limited participation by third parties. 37 CFR 1.902-1.997 provide for inter partes reexamination of patents. Similar to ex parte reexamination, inter partes reexamination provides a procedure in which......
-
Transitional Program for Covered Business Method Patents-Definitions of Covered Business Method Patent and Technological Invention
...by an examiner with a right of appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and allow for limited participation by third parties. 37 CFR 1.902-1.997 provide for inter partes reexamination of patents. Similar to ex parte reexamination, inter partes reexamination provides a procedure in which......
Request a trial to view additional results
95 cases
-
Abbott Labs. v. Cordis Corp., No. 2012–1244.
...before the Board. The PTO's regulations for inter partes reexaminations make no provision for either party to take depositions. See37 C.F.R. §§ 1.902–.997 (2005). The PTO's regulations indeed specifically exclude appeals of inter partes reexaminations (the only stage of the reexamination oc......
-
Life Technologies Corp. v. 454 Life Sciences Corp., Appeal 2015-000178
...A request for inter partes reexamination of the '690 patent was filed Sept. 15, 2011. Request under 35 U.S.C. §§ 311-318 (pre-AIA) and 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.902-1.997 (pre-AIA) ("Request"). The Examiner determined that claims 1-9, 20-28, 39-47, and 57-65 are unpatentable. Right of Appeal Notice ("......
-
NEC Corporation and Sumitomo Chemical Co. Ltd. v. Entegris, Inc., Appeal 2006-3236
...benefit of Japanese Application 11/124326, filed April 30, 1999. This inter partes reexamination was conducted under the regulations of 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.902-1.997 (effective Feb. 5, 2001), and 37 C.F.R. §§ 41.61-41.81 (effective September 13, 2004). The version of the regulations does not aff......
-
Presens Precision Sensing GMBH v. University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, Appeal 2015-006297
...("Appeal Br.") 1 (dated November 18, 2014). A request for inter partes reexamination of the '532 patent under 35 U.S.C. §§311-318 and 37 C.F.R §§ 1.902-1.997 was filed on January 13, 2011 ("Request"). The Requester is PreSens Precision Sensing GmbH ("Requester"), who is also the Respondent ......
Request a trial to view additional results