29 C.F.R. § 102.67 - Proceedings before the regional director; further hearing; action by the regional director; appeals from actions of the regional director; statement in opposition; requests for extraordinary relief; Notice of Election; voter list

Cite as29 C.F.R. § 102.67
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
151 practice notes
  • Representation-Case Procedures
    • United States
    • Federal Register February 06, 2014
    • 6 Febrero 2014
    ...significant delays. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ 29 CFR 102.63 and 102.64 (1959). \10\ 29 CFR 102.67 and 102.68 Accordingly, in 1959, as part of the amendments of the NLRA effected by the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, Congr......
  • Representation-Case Procedures
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 15, 2014
    • 15 Diciembre 2014
    ...a failure to request review pre- election or a denial of review precludes a party from raising the matter with the Board post-election. 29 CFR 102.67(b) and Page 74333 Notably, none of the comments suggests that the current rules as to pre-election disputes violate Section 3(b) or are other......
  • Representation-Case Procedures
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 22, 2011
    • 22 Diciembre 2011
    ...a failure to request review pre-election or a denial of review precludes a party from raising the matter with the Board post-election. 29 CFR 102.67(f). Moreover, even under the current rules, specifically Sec. 102.69(c)(4), if the regional director issues a decision concerning challenges o......
  • NLRB v. Air Control Products of St. Petersburg, Inc., No. 21017.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • 28 Julio 1964
    ...toward determining whether an election should be directed and the appropriate unit in which to hold the election. 29 C.F.R. §§ 102.63, 102.67. In recognition of their unique character, Congress has removed representation hearings from the requirements of § 5 of the Administrative Procedure ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
141 cases
  • NLRB v. Air Control Products of St. Petersburg, Inc., No. 21017.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • 28 Julio 1964
    ...toward determining whether an election should be directed and the appropriate unit in which to hold the election. 29 C.F.R. §§ 102.63, 102.67. In recognition of their unique character, Congress has removed representation hearings from the requirements of § 5 of the Administrative Procedure ......
  • Chamber of Commerce of U.S. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., Civil Action No. 15–0009 (ABJ)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • 29 Julio 2015
    ...director shall schedule the election for the earliest date practicable" consistent with the NLRA and the relevant regulations. 29 C.F.R. § 102.67(b).1. The elimination of the presumptive pre-election waiting period does not violate the NLRA or the First Amendment. Both sets of plaintiffs co......
  • KFC National Management Corp. v. NLRB, No. 821
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • 8 Mayo 1974
    ...has resulted in prejudicial error. (4) That there are compelling reasons for reconsideration of an important Board rule or policy. 29 C.F.R. § 102.67(c). Section 102.67 makes it clear that the decision on whether or not to grant such review is also to be made by the Board. See 29 C.F.R. § 1......
  • Pilot Freight Carriers v. INTERN. BROTH., ETC., No. C-219-WS-72.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. Middle District of North Carolina
    • 23 Julio 1980
    ...or undiscovered evidence, parties may not relitigate a representation issue in a subsequent unfair labor practice proceeding. 29 C.F.R. § 102.67(f) (1975); see 29 U.S.C. § 159(d). The Supreme Court and a variety of circuit courts have approved the Board's practice. Pittsburgh Plate Glass v.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
2 books & journal articles
  • Outkicking the Coverage: The Unionization of College Athletes
    • United States
    • Louisiana Law Review Nbr. 77-2, January 2017
    • 1 Enero 2017
    ...for precluding an election, and will establish the scope and composition of the collective bargaining unit. Id. 51. Id. at 2840. 52. 29 C.F.R. §102.67(a)–(b) (2016). 53. Id. 54. See infra Part II. 55. Northwestern Univ. & Coll. Athletes Players Ass’n, 362 N.L.R.B. No. 167 (Aug. 17, 2015). 5......
  • Recent NLRB Actions Give Boost to Union Organizing, 0415 COBJ, 2015, April, Pg. 29
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Journal Nbr. 44-4, April 2015
    • 1 Abril 2015
    ...F.Supp.2d at 30. [10] 10 60 Fed. Reg. at 74309-10 (summarizing amendments). [11] 11 60 Fed. Reg. at 74486 (to be codified at 29 CFR § 102.67(1)). [12] 12 60 Fed. Reg. at 74490 (to be codified at 29 CFR § [13] 13 Id. [14] 14 See 29 USC § 158(c). [15] 15 See 60 Fed. Reg. at 744......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT