29 C.F.R. §102.67 - Proceedings before the Regional Director; further hearing; action by the Regional Director; appeals from actions of the Regional Director; statement in opposition; requests for extraordinary relief; Notice of Election; voter list

Cite as29 C.F.R. §102.67
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
143 cases
  • Am. Fed'n of Labor & Cong. of Indus. Organizations v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., Civ. No. 20-cv-0675 (KBJ)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • 7 Junio 2020
    ...regional director shall schedule the election for the earliest date practicable consistent 466 F.Supp.3d 79 with these rules[,]" 29 C.F.R. § 102.67(b) (2019), but the 2019 Election Rule adds that "the Regional Director will normally not schedule an election before the 20th business day afte......
  • Riverside Press, Inc. v. NLRB, 25783.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • 11 Septiembre 1969
    ...a hearing of its Trial Examiner's decision in the unfair labor practice case, including his invocation of the no-relitigation rule (29 C.F.R. § 102.67(c), the Board effectively foreclosed any relief in the § 10 16 If the majority conclusion, based on Cheney, is otherwise correct we still sh......
  • N.L.R.B. v. Annapolis Emergency Hosp. Ass'n, Inc., 76-1166
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • 6 Junio 1977
    ...on the part of MNA was new. Board regulations do not permit the filing of a reply brief except upon special leave of the Board, 29 C.F.R. § 102.67(i). The Board's supplemental decision and direction of election (which in the main text we construe to mean that the Board certified MNA solely ......
  • Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. NLRB, 22501
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • 2 Febrero 1970
    ...in an unfair labor practice proceeding of "any issue which was, or could have been, raised in the representation proceeding". 29 C.F.R. § 102.67(f). This policy has been sustained by the courts. N. L. R. B. v. Tennessee Packers, Inc., 379 F.2d 172 (6th Cir.), cert. den., 389 U.S. 958, 88 S.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Outkicking the Coverage: The Unionization of College Athletes
    • United States
    • Louisiana Law Review No. 77-2, January 2017
    • 1 Enero 2017
    ...for precluding an election, and will establish the scope and composition of the collective bargaining unit. Id. 51. Id. at 2840. 52. 29 C.F.R. §102.67(a)–(b) (2016). 53. Id. 54. See infra Part II. 55. Northwestern Univ. & Coll. Athletes Players Ass’n, 362 N.L.R.B. No. 167 (Aug. 17, 2015). 5......
  • Recent NLRB Actions Give Boost to Union Organizing, 0415 COBJ, 2015, April, Pg. 29
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Journal No. 44-4, April 2015
    • 1 Abril 2015
    ...F.Supp.2d at 30. [10] 10 60 Fed. Reg. at 74309-10 (summarizing amendments). [11] 11 60 Fed. Reg. at 74486 (to be codified at 29 CFR § 102.67(1)). [12] 12 60 Fed. Reg. at 74490 (to be codified at 29 CFR § [13] 13 Id. [14] 14 See 29 USC § 158(c). [15] 15 See 60 Fed. Reg. at 744......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT