40 CFR 123.62 - Procedures for revision of State programs

Cite as40 CFR 123.62
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
59 practice notes
  • Water pollution control: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System— Cooling water intake structures at Phase III facilities; requirements,
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 24, 2004
    • November 24, 2004
    ...What Are the Respective Federal, State, and Tribal Roles? Section 316(b) requirements are implemented through NPDES permits. Under 40 CFR 123.62(e), any existing approved State or Tribal section 402 permitting program would be revised to be consistent with new program requirements within on......
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register July 09, 2004
    • July 9, 2004
    ...(40 CFR part 125, subpart J). Therefore, today's final rule affects authorized State and Tribal NPDES permit programs. Under 40 CFR 123.62(e), any existing approved section 402 permitting program must be revised to be consistent with new program requirements within one year from the date of......
  • Water pollution control: National pollutant discharge elimination system; State programs— Texas,
    • United States
    • Federal Register September 24, 1998
    • September 24, 1998
    ...future changes in controlling statutes or regulations are subject to the EPA approval, public notice, and public comment requirements of 40 CFR 123.62. There is no special processing program for storm water permits. All TPDES permits follow the processing, EPA review, and public comment pro......
  • Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals,
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 21, 2005
    • October 21, 2005
    ...Program: Streamlining Final Rule; in 40 CFR 403.1-403.20; 40 CFR 437; 40 CFR 437.41; 40 CFR 105; 40 CFR 455.41; 40 CFR 123.24; 40 CFR 123.62; 40 CFR 122.42(b)(2); was approved 09/22/2005; OMB Number 2040-0009; expires EPA ICR No. 1895.03; Microbial Rules (Renewal); in 40 CFR 141.21; 40 CFR ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
  • Ohio Valley Envtl. Coal., Inc. v. Marfork Coal Co., Civil Action No. 5:12–1464.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. Southern District of West Virginia
    • August 22, 2013
    ...a revision to West Virginia's approved NPDES program. Such revisions generally are not effective unless and until approved by EPA. 40 C.F.R. § 123.62(b)(4). Based on the Court's ruling, however, it is unnecessary to decide this question. 9. “Explicit” authorization is granted by the precise......
  • Ohio Vally Envtl. Coal., Inc. v. Fola Coal Co., CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-3750
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. Southern District of West Virginia
    • December 19, 2013
    ...to request a public hearing. Such a hearing will be held if there is significant public interest based on requests received.40 C.F.R. § 123.62(b)(2). The EPA's public notice regarding consolidation of surface mining and water pollution control for coal facilities in West Virginia appeared a......
  • Valstad v. Cipriano, No. 4-04-0223.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • May 10, 2005
    ...Indian [t]ribe has subsequently been approved for assumption of the NPDES program under 40 C.F.R. part 123 extending to those lands." 40 C.F.R. § 123.62(a) Plaintiffs claim that under the plain language of section 123.62(a), the United States EPA administrator was required to approve sectio......
  • Save the Valley, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., Cause No. IP 99-0058-C-B/G.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. United States District Court (Southern District of Indiana)
    • September 17, 2002
    ...EPA approved in 1991, or (2) must itself be submitted to and approved by the [EPA] as a revision to the Indiana NPDES program under 40 C.F.R. § 123.62." Pl.Ex. N at 2. In August 2000, the EPA informed IDEM that by September 30, 2001, it would determine the "recommended course of action rega......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT