5 CFR 316.402 - Procedures for making temporary appointments

Cite as5 CFR 316.402
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 practice notes
  • Taydus v. Cisneros, Civ. A. No. 94-10326-RCL.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Massachusetts
    • 25 Agosto 1995
    ...the ACWA exam for preference eligible veterans with a service connected disability or veterans of the Vietnam era such as plaintiff. 5 C.F.R. § 316.402(b)(4) & (5). Plaintiff advised a HUD official about the relevant regulations allowing for the noncompetitive appointment of preference elig......
  • Taydus v. Cisneros, Civ. A. No. 94-10326-RCL.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Massachusetts
    • 6 Julio 1995
    ...the qualifications for a veterans readjustment appointment and to any disabled veteran with a disability of at least 30 percent. 5 C.F.R. § 316.402(b)(4) & (5).5 U.S.C. § 701(a)(2). Defendant points out that the applicable statute and regulations, section 3112 and 5 C.F.R. § 316.402, ......
  • Employment: Homeland Security Act of 2002; implementation— Severe shortage of candidates and critical hiring needs; Governmentwide human resources flexibilities (direct-hire authority, etc.),
    • United States
    • Federal Register June 13, 2003
    • 13 Junio 2003
    ...in a National Emergency; 5 CFR part 301, subpart B, Overseas Limited Appointments; 5 CFR 316.302, Selection of Term Employees; and 5 CFR 316.402, Procedures for Making Temporary This interim regulation will add subpart B to 5 CFR part 337 and amends 5 CFR parts 230, 301 and 316. Elimination......
  • Johnson v. Perez, No. 15–5034.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • 20 Mayo 2016
    ...Captain, and hired him into a noncompetitive position for qualified veterans with service-related disabilities. See 5 U.S.C. § 3112 ; 5 C.F.R. § 316.402(b)(4). The post was a temporary one with a possibility of permanent employment. 5 U.S.C. § 3112 ; 823 F.3d 704 5 C.F.R. § 316.402(b)(4). P......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
  • Taydus v. Cisneros, Civ. A. No. 94-10326-RCL.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Massachusetts
    • 25 Agosto 1995
    ...the ACWA exam for preference eligible veterans with a service connected disability or veterans of the Vietnam era such as plaintiff. 5 C.F.R. § 316.402(b)(4) & (5). Plaintiff advised a HUD official about the relevant regulations allowing for the noncompetitive appointment of preference elig......
  • Taydus v. Cisneros, Civ. A. No. 94-10326-RCL.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Massachusetts
    • 6 Julio 1995
    ...the qualifications for a veterans readjustment appointment and to any disabled veteran with a disability of at least 30 percent. 5 C.F.R. § 316.402(b)(4) & (5).5 U.S.C. § 701(a)(2). Defendant points out that the applicable statute and regulations, section 3112 and 5 C.F.R. § 316.402, ......
  • Johnson v. Perez, No. 15–5034.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • 20 Mayo 2016
    ...Captain, and hired him into a noncompetitive position for qualified veterans with service-related disabilities. See 5 U.S.C. § 3112 ; 5 C.F.R. § 316.402(b)(4). The post was a temporary one with a possibility of permanent employment. 5 U.S.C. § 3112 ; 823 F.3d 704 5 C.F.R. § 316.402(b)(4). P......
  • Shaposka v. United States, No. 220-75.
    • United States
    • Court of Federal Claims
    • 19 Octubre 1977
    ...of Personnel Action) recorded plaintiff's hiring by the Archives as a temporary appointment not to exceed one year, and cited 5 C.F.R. § 316.402(b)(1) (1972)2 as the authority for such an appointment. Defendant concedes that such an appointment was an error because it did not fall under any......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT