8 CFR 208.9 - Procedure for interview before an asylum officer

Cite as8 CFR 208.9
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
70 practice notes
  • Procedures for Credible Fear Screening and Consideration of Asylum, Withholding of Removal, and CAT Protection Claims by Asylum Officers
    • United States
    • Executive Office For Immigration Review
    • Invalid date
    ...out this new responsibility fully, additional changes to the regulations have been proposed. First, the Departments propose that under 8 CFR 208.9(f), asylum officers would be required to record the asylum hearing and that a transcript of that recording would be made part of the record when......
  • Procedures for Asylum and Withholding of Removal; Credible Fear and Reasonable Fear Review
    • United States
    • Executive Office For Immigration Review,Homeland Security Department
    • Invalid date
    ...possibility of persecution or a reasonable possibility of torture, and conduct an evaluation and determination in accordance with 8 CFR 208.9(c), which is consistent with current policy and practice. These proposals aim to provide greater transparency and clarity with regard to fear DHS als......
  • Procedures for Asylum and Bars to Asylum Eligibility
    • United States
    • Executive Office For Immigration Review,U.s. Citizenship And Immigration Services
    • Invalid date
    ...alien child, DHS asylum officers determine in the first instance whether an alien's asylum application should be granted. See 8 CFR 208.9. At the same time, the Act retained for the Attorney General authority over certain individual immigration adjudications, including those related to asyl......
  • Immigration: Detention of aliens ordered removed,
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 21, 2000
    • December 21, 2000
    ...alien and making closing statements. It was also suggested that the panel interview should be modeled after asylum interviews pursuant to 8 CFR 208.9(d). Nothing in the final rule prohibits the representative from speaking and assisting the alien or making a closing statement; however, the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
59 cases
  • Diaz v. INS, No. Civ. S-83-436 LKK.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Eastern District of California
    • September 26, 1986
    ...non-appealable, 8 C.F.R. § 208.8(c) (1986), the alien may renew his or her application for asylum in exclusion or deportation hearings. 8 C.F.R. § 208.9 (1986); see also 8 C.F.R. § 208.3(b) (1986). After the exclusion or deportation hearing, the alien may appeal in some circumstances to the......
  • Jie Hao v. Powell, No. 08-56421.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • September 2, 2010
    ...policy to support a claim of unconstitutional policymaking. See Nurse, 226 F.3d at 1002.621 F.3d 951 The plaintiffs' claim under 8 C.F.R. § 208.9 was properly dismissed; it was not a claim for which California law would provide a remedy against a private party. The plaintiffs' claim under A......
  • Grace v. Barr, No. 19-5013
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • July 17, 2020
    ...rule, also applies in interviews conducted by USCIS asylum officers in connection with affirmative asylum applications. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.9(a) (stating that USCIS "shall adjudicate" affirmative asylum applications); Guidance 1, J.A. 353 ("[The Guidance] applies to and shall be used to guid......
  • Haitian Centers Council, Inc. v. McNary, No. 2023
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • July 29, 1992
    ..."a cruel hoax", he nonetheless denied the injunction. Relying on his prior decision that the right to counsel under 8 U.S.C. § 1362 and 8 C.F.R. § 208.9 is limited to aliens found in the United States, Judge Johnson concluded that "Section 243(h) is similarly unavailable as a source of reli......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT