24 CFR 965.101 - Preemption of State prevailing wage requirements
| Cite as | 24 CFR 965.101 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Public Housing Capital Fund Program
...activity to upgrade utility systems; for example, electric, water, or gas systems of the PHA consistent with the requirements of 24 CFR part 965. (15) Administrative costs. Any administrative costs, including salaries and employee benefit contributions, other than the Capital Fund Program F......
-
Adams County Interfaith v. Prev. Wage, No. 662 C.D. 2008.
...to the projects falling under the exception would run counter to the federal policy. Further, the Secretary's decision is barred under 24 C.F.R. § 965.101, which provides that state rates that are higher than federal rates in the same geographical area are to be deemed inflated and The Bure......
1 cases
-
Adams County Interfaith v. Prev. Wage, No. 662 C.D. 2008.
...to the projects falling under the exception would run counter to the federal policy. Further, the Secretary's decision is barred under 24 C.F.R. § 965.101, which provides that state rates that are higher than federal rates in the same geographical area are to be deemed inflated and The Bure......