49 C.F.R. §382.301 - Pre-employment testing

Cite as49 C.F.R. §382.301
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
23 cases
  • Montoya v. CRST Expedited, Inc., Civil Action No. 16-10095-PBS
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Massachusetts
    • 6 Septiembre 2019
    ...Court may consider it as persuasive authority. See Newman v. Advanced Tech. Innovation Corp., 749 F.3d 33, 37 (1st Cir. 2014).12 See 49 C.F.R. § 382.301 (requiring an employer to receive a negative pre-employment drug test result before letting a driver operate a commercial motor vehicle); ......
  • C. Pepper Logistics v. Lanter Delivery Sys., 4:20-cv-01444-MTS
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 8th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Missouri)
    • 23 Agosto 2021
    ...Express, Inc., No. 1:18-cv-01014, 2021 WL 848948, at *1 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 5, 2021). [19] Plaintiffs also assert that Defendants violated 49 C.F.R. §§ 382.301, 390.11, 390.6, 390.13, and 391.21, ostensibly in support of their § 14704 claim. Doc. [42] ¶¶ 68-71. But it appears that § 14704-which......
  • Ziemkiewicz v. R+L Carriers, Inc., Civil Action No. RDB–13–0438.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Maryland)
    • 6 Febrero 2014
    ...A DOT-required test can only be given in certain circumstances, such as pre-employment, after an accident, or at a random interval. 49 C.F.R. §§ 382.301, 382.303, 382.305. A random drug and alcohol screen must not be announced in advance. 49 C.F.R. § 382.305(k). Rather, the Regulations requ......
  • Fontaine v. Clermont County Bd. of Com'Rs, 1:05-CV-00335.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. Southern District of Ohio
    • 6 Septiembre 2007
    ...2 position Plaintiff sought required he hold a CDL, Defendants were required to subject him to pre-employment drug testing (Id. citing 49 C.F.R. 382.301(a)). Indeed, the applicable federal regulations require employers of CDL holders to perform random drug testing (Id. citing 49 C.F.R. From......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT