21 C.F.R. § 1301.75 - Physical security controls for practitioners

Cite as21 C.F.R. § 1301.75
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
23 practice notes
  • Jeffery J. Becker, D.D.S., and Jeffery J. Becker, D.D.S., Affordable Care Decision and Order
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 05, 2012
    • December 5, 2012
    ...mitigating evidence, it is sufficiently egregious to support the revocation of his registration. Exception 2--Respondent's Violation of 21 CFR 1301.75(b) Does Not Support the Revocation of His Respondent also argues that the evidence pertaining to the storage of controlled substances at his......
  • Howard N. Robinson, M.D.; Decision and Order
    • United States
    • Federal Register April 08, 2014
    • April 8, 2014
    ...are delivered to it. And while the controlled substances must be ``stored in a securely locked, substantially constructed cabinet,'' 21 CFR 1301.75(b), nothing in the CSA or DEA regulations prohibits a registrant from designating a properly-screened and trustworthy employee (or appointing a......
  • Disposal of Controlled Substances
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 21, 2012
    • December 21, 2012
    ...substances throughout the stock of non-controlled substances in order to deter the theft or diversion of the controlled substances. See 21 CFR 1301.75(b). DEA proposes in section 1317.30 that federal, state, tribal, and local law enforcement agencies continue with authority to collect ultim......
  • Schedules of Controlled Substances: Rescheduling of Hydrocodone Combination Products From Schedule III to Schedule II
    • United States
    • Federal Register August 22, 2014
    • August 22, 2014
    ...are not required by the CSA or DEA regulations to place schedule II controlled substances in a vault or safe. In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.75(b), pharmacies may disperse schedule II controlled substances throughout their stock of noncontrolled substances in such a manner as to obstruct th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Wedgewood Village Pharmacy v. D.E.A., No. 06-1156.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • December 11, 2007
    ...strict storage and security requirements. Compare 21 C.F.R. § 1301.72 (storage and security requirements for "non-practitioner") with 21 C.F.R. § 1301.75 (security requirements for practitioner). Similarly, both a manufacturer and a distributor have more stringent record-keeping requirement......
  • Cahn v. COPAC, Inc., No. 2014–CA–00021–COA.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Mississippi
    • December 8, 2015
    ...§ 1301.71(a) (“All [licensees] shall provide effective controls to guard against theft and diversion of controlled substances”); 21 C.F.R. § 1301.75(b) (“Controlled substances listed in Schedules II, III, IV, and V shall be stored in a securely locked, substantially constructed cabinet.”). ......
  • Cnty. of Lake v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. (In re Nat'l Prescription Opiate Litig.), MDL 2804
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court of Northern District of Ohio
    • August 6, 2020
    ...controls that a registrant must implement in order to store and dispense Schedule II controlled substances safely at their stores. See 21 C.F.R. § 1301.75 - 76.But it is equally certain that the Pharmacy Defendants’ statutory obligations do not end there. With respect to diversion more broa......
  • US v. Poulin, Civil A. No. 93-12265-REK.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Massachusetts
    • April 19, 1996
    ...throughout the stock of noncontrolled substances in such a manner as to obstruct theft or diversion of the controlled substances." 21 C.F.R. § 1301.75(b). Neither the regulations nor precedents specify a penalty for violation of these security provisions. From the evidence in this case, the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT