Physical qualifications for drivers

CurrencyCurrent through May 31, 2023
Citation 49 C.F.R. §391.41
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
327 cases
  • Richardson v. Mabus
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Court (Maine)
    • August 24, 2016
    ...Matrix ("Surveillance Manual"), which specifically refers to Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ("FMCSA") regulations, 49 C.F.R. §§ 391.41 -49, and the FMCSA Frequently Asked Questions. DSMF ¶ 12; PRDSMF ¶ 12.17 From about January 2011 until the end of his employment with NAVFAC, M......
  • Murphy v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. United States District Court of Eastern District of Wisconsin
    • March 23, 2021
    ...examination, which the plaintiff did. Dkt. No. 19 at ¶14. The applicant also must meet the hearing threshold required by the FMCSA. 49 C.F.R. § 391.41(b)(11). The plaintiff obtained an exemption from the hearing requirement through an experimental program conducted by the FMCSA. Dkt. No. 19......
  • Johnson v. State Technology Center at Memphis, 97-2716-V.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. Western District of Tennessee
    • October 6, 1998
    ...or a photographic copy, of a medical examiner's certificate that he/she is physically qualified to drive a commercial motor vehicle. 49 C.F.R. § 391.41(a) (1998). The federal regulations also provide an alternate means of becoming qualified to drive a commercial motor vehicle for those indi......
  • Cousins v. Secretary of U.S. Dept. of Transp., 88-1106
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (1st Circuit)
    • June 7, 1988
    ...prohibits deaf persons from driving motor carriers in interstate commerce, regardless of their ability to perform such duties. See 49 C.F.R. Sec. 391.41(b)(11) (1987). 2 Plaintiff challenged this regulation in the United States District Court for the District of Maine by bringing suit under......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT