37 CFR 1.144 - Petition from requirement for restriction
| Cite as | 37 CFR 1.144 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
65 practice notes
-
Patent cases: Patent business goals; implementation,
...of the restriction requirement, the applicant would continue to have the right to request reconsideration (37 CFR 1.143) and review (37 CFR 1.144) of the restriction requirement. The only change is that an applicant's election would be a constructive election based upon the order of present......
-
Conmed Corp. v. Ludlow Corp., No. 5:00-CV-633.
...Cartmell did not file a divisional application, file a new patent application or otherwise challenge the restriction requirement. See 37 C.F.R. § 1.144 ("After a final requirement for restriction, the applicant ... may petition the Commissioner to review the requirement. Petition ... must b......
-
Ex parte Prichard, Appeal 2020-001001
...notes (see id.), matters regarding restriction requirements are to be resolved via petition to the technology center Director. See 37 C.F.R. § 1.144; Manual of Patent Examining Procedure § 1002.02(c) ("MPEP"). Thus, we consider claim 37 withdrawn and not pending on appeal. Rejection I - 35 ......
-
Application of Weber, Appeal No. 77-622.
...from restriction. For one thing, rejections are appealable to the board and restriction requirements are not. Federico, op. cit. p. 34; 37 CFR § 1.144. On this appeal from the rejection of claims 1-6 we do not have before us a restriction requirement under § 121. Such a requirement would no......
Request a trial to view additional results
64 cases
-
Conmed Corp. v. Ludlow Corp., No. 5:00-CV-633.
...Cartmell did not file a divisional application, file a new patent application or otherwise challenge the restriction requirement. See 37 C.F.R. § 1.144 ("After a final requirement for restriction, the applicant ... may petition the Commissioner to review the requirement. Petition ... must b......
-
Ex parte Prichard, Appeal 2020-001001
...notes (see id.), matters regarding restriction requirements are to be resolved via petition to the technology center Director. See 37 C.F.R. § 1.144; Manual of Patent Examining Procedure § 1002.02(c) ("MPEP"). Thus, we consider claim 37 withdrawn and not pending on appeal. Rejection I - 35 ......
-
Application of Weber, Appeal No. 77-622.
...from restriction. For one thing, rejections are appealable to the board and restriction requirements are not. Federico, op. cit. p. 34; 37 CFR § 1.144. On this appeal from the rejection of claims 1-6 we do not have before us a restriction requirement under § 121. Such a requirement would no......
-
Ex parte Gifford, Appeal 1998-0631
...not shown in Fig. 4" (Paper No. 15, p. 2) and noting that the claims are withdrawn from consideration. Appellant filed a Petition under 37 CFR § 1.144 (Paper No. 16) on December 5, 1994, before entry of Paper No. 15, which was lost and resubmitted by facsimile on June 20, 1995, requesting t......
Request a trial to view additional results