49 C.F.R. §391.45 - Persons who must be medically examined and certified

Cite as49 C.F.R. §391.45
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
38 cases
  • Estate of Szleszinski v. Lirc
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin
    • 18 Julio 2007
    ...and whenever the driver's "ability to perform his/her normal duties has been impaired by a physical or mental injury or disease." 49 C.F.R. § 391.45(b)(1) and (c). A driver carrying an otherwise valid medical examination certification may not drive if he or she becomes physically unqualifie......
  • Perry v. Dillon's Bus Serv., Inc., Civil Action No. ELH-16-3207
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Maryland)
    • 9 Junio 2017
    ...operate a CMV. See 49 C.F.R. §§ 391.11(b)(4), 391.41, 391.43, & 391.45. The driver must be medically certified every 24 months. See 49 C.F.R. § 391.45(b)(1). However, if the driver's "ability to perform [his or her] normal duties has been impaired by a physical or mental injury or disease,"......
  • Rivera v. Browning-Ferris Industries, Civil No. 07-1096 (RLA).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Puerto Rico
    • 16 Junio 2009
    ...two years in accordance with the pertinent regulations as physically qualified to operate a commercial motor vehicle. In this regard, 49 CFR § 391.45 Except as provided in § 391.67, the following persons must be medically examined and certified in accordance with § 391.43 as physically qual......
  • Kube v. New Penn Motor Express, Inc., Civ. No. 93-0162(SSB).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • 30 Septiembre 1994
    ...renewed every two years, and following a period of injury or disease which impaired the driver's ability to perform his duties. 49 C.F.R. § 391.45(b)(1), Defendant argues that plaintiff's state law claims are pre-empted because a determination of those claims would directly conflict with de......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT