37 CFR 1.913 - Persons eligible to file, and time for filing, a request for inter partes reexamination

Cite as37 CFR 1.913
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
17 practice notes
  • Cooper Technologies Co. v. Dudas, No. 2008-1130.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • August 19, 2008
    ...proposed adding "Subpart H—Inter Partes Reexamination of Patents." Id. at 18,177. Included in that subsection was proposed regulation 37 C.F.R. § 1.913, which read: Except as provided for in § 1.907, any person other than the patent owner or its privies may, at any time during the period of......
  • Pass & Seymour, Inc. v. Hubbell, Inc., APPEAL 2013-001548
    • United States
    • United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board
    • February 28, 2013
    ...at 1-2. B. This Reexamination Proceeding This reexamination proceeding was initiated by a "Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.913" (hereinafter "Request") filed on November 29, 2006, and seeking reexamination of claims 1-51 (all of the original claims) of the Benoit ......
  • Nike, Inc. v. Adidas AG, APPEAL 2012-009052
    • United States
    • United States Patent and Trademark Office. United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board
    • September 26, 2012
    ...CASE A. Th is Reexam ination Proceeding 1. This proceeding arose from a December 2, 2009, "Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.913" (hereinafter "Request").[5] The Request proposed rejections (identified therein as Issues A-J) of claims 1-14, 35, 37-56, 77, and 79-103......
  • In re Pactiv LLC, Appeal 2013-001728
    • United States
    • United States Patent and Trademark Office. United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board
    • August 15, 2013
    ...different statutory and regulatory regime. See 35 USC § 303 (2002) and 37 CFR § 1.510 for Ex Parte Reexamination; 35 USC § 312 (2011) and 37 CFR § 1.913 (2002) for Inter Partes Reexamination. Nonetheless, we fail to see the applicability of Belkin. In Belkin, the Examiner had not found an S......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
16 cases
  • Cooper Technologies Co. v. Dudas, No. 2008-1130.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • August 19, 2008
    ...proposed adding "Subpart H—Inter Partes Reexamination of Patents." Id. at 18,177. Included in that subsection was proposed regulation 37 C.F.R. § 1.913, which read: Except as provided for in § 1.907, any person other than the patent owner or its privies may, at any time during the period of......
  • Pass & Seymour, Inc. v. Hubbell, Inc., APPEAL 2013-001548
    • United States
    • United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board
    • February 28, 2013
    ...at 1-2. B. This Reexamination Proceeding This reexamination proceeding was initiated by a "Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.913" (hereinafter "Request") filed on November 29, 2006, and seeking reexamination of claims 1-51 (all of the original claims) of the Benoit ......
  • Nike, Inc. v. Adidas AG, APPEAL 2012-009052
    • United States
    • United States Patent and Trademark Office. United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board
    • September 26, 2012
    ...CASE A. Th is Reexam ination Proceeding 1. This proceeding arose from a December 2, 2009, "Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.913" (hereinafter "Request").[5] The Request proposed rejections (identified therein as Issues A-J) of claims 1-14, 35, 37-56, 77, and 79-103......
  • In re Pactiv LLC, Appeal 2013-001728
    • United States
    • United States Patent and Trademark Office. United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board
    • August 15, 2013
    ...different statutory and regulatory regime. See 35 USC § 303 (2002) and 37 CFR § 1.510 for Ex Parte Reexamination; 35 USC § 312 (2011) and 37 CFR § 1.913 (2002) for Inter Partes Reexamination. Nonetheless, we fail to see the applicability of Belkin. In Belkin, the Examiner had not found an S......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Patent Reform Update: 'Inter Partes' Reexamination Rule Change
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • October 11, 2011
    ...requests will be terminated and replaced by new post-grant inter partes review procedures established under the AIA. Specifically, 37 CFR § 1.913 has been amended to provide that an inter partes reexamination request filed on or after September 16, 2012, will not be In their comments to the......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT