37 CFR 1.913 - Persons eligible to file, and time for filing, a request for inter partes reexamination
| Cite as | 37 CFR 1.913 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 practice notes
-
Cooper Technologies Co. v. Dudas, No. 2008-1130.
...proposed adding "Subpart H—Inter Partes Reexamination of Patents." Id. at 18,177. Included in that subsection was proposed regulation 37 C.F.R. § 1.913, which read: Except as provided for in § 1.907, any person other than the patent owner or its privies may, at any time during the period of......
-
Pass & Seymour, Inc. v. Hubbell, Inc., APPEAL 2013-001548
...at 1-2. B. This Reexamination Proceeding This reexamination proceeding was initiated by a "Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.913" (hereinafter "Request") filed on November 29, 2006, and seeking reexamination of claims 1-51 (all of the original claims) of the Benoit ......
-
Nike, Inc. v. Adidas AG, APPEAL 2012-009052
...CASE A. Th is Reexam ination Proceeding 1. This proceeding arose from a December 2, 2009, "Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.913" (hereinafter "Request").[5] The Request proposed rejections (identified therein as Issues A-J) of claims 1-14, 35, 37-56, 77, and 79-103......
-
In re Pactiv LLC, Appeal 2013-001728
...different statutory and regulatory regime. See 35 USC § 303 (2002) and 37 CFR § 1.510 for Ex Parte Reexamination; 35 USC § 312 (2011) and 37 CFR § 1.913 (2002) for Inter Partes Reexamination. Nonetheless, we fail to see the applicability of Belkin. In Belkin, the Examiner had not found an S......
Request a trial to view additional results
16 cases
-
Cooper Technologies Co. v. Dudas, No. 2008-1130.
...proposed adding "Subpart H—Inter Partes Reexamination of Patents." Id. at 18,177. Included in that subsection was proposed regulation 37 C.F.R. § 1.913, which read: Except as provided for in § 1.907, any person other than the patent owner or its privies may, at any time during the period of......
-
Pass & Seymour, Inc. v. Hubbell, Inc., APPEAL 2013-001548
...at 1-2. B. This Reexamination Proceeding This reexamination proceeding was initiated by a "Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.913" (hereinafter "Request") filed on November 29, 2006, and seeking reexamination of claims 1-51 (all of the original claims) of the Benoit ......
-
Nike, Inc. v. Adidas AG, APPEAL 2012-009052
...CASE A. Th is Reexam ination Proceeding 1. This proceeding arose from a December 2, 2009, "Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.913" (hereinafter "Request").[5] The Request proposed rejections (identified therein as Issues A-J) of claims 1-14, 35, 37-56, 77, and 79-103......
-
In re Pactiv LLC, Appeal 2013-001728
...different statutory and regulatory regime. See 35 USC § 303 (2002) and 37 CFR § 1.510 for Ex Parte Reexamination; 35 USC § 312 (2011) and 37 CFR § 1.913 (2002) for Inter Partes Reexamination. Nonetheless, we fail to see the applicability of Belkin. In Belkin, the Examiner had not found an S......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Patent Reform Update: 'Inter Partes' Reexamination Rule Change
...requests will be terminated and replaced by new post-grant inter partes review procedures established under the AIA. Specifically, 37 CFR § 1.913 has been amended to provide that an inter partes reexamination request filed on or after September 16, 2012, will not be In their comments to the......