29 CFR 1926.28 - Personal protective equipment

Cite as29 CFR 1926.28
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
67 practice notes
  • Part III
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 15, 2007
    • November 15, 2007
    ...final rule incorporates PPE payment provisions into the OSHA standards applicable to general industry (29 CFR part 1910), construction (29 CFR part 1926), shipyards (29 CFR part 1915), longshoring (29 CFR part 1917), and marine terminals (29 CFR part \6\ Some employees in agriculture are co......
  • Safety and health standards, etc.: Employer payment for personal protective equipment,
    • United States
    • Federal Register March 31, 1999
    • March 31, 1999
    ...are codified in Subpart Z of 29 CFR 1910.1000). In other cases, however, such as in paragraph (a) of 29 CFR 1910.132 and paragraph (a) of 29 CFR 1926.28, who is required to pay for the PPE is not expressly specified. (For a complete list of OSHA's PPE requirements, see the Summary and Expla......
  • Separate Parts In This Issue Part III Labor Department, Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 15, 2007
    • November 15, 2007
    ...final rule incorporates PPE payment provisions into the OSHA standards applicable to general industry (29 CFR part 1910), construction (29 CFR part 1926), shipyards (29 CFR part 1915), longshoring (29 CFR part 1917), and marine terminals (29 CFR part \6\ Some employees in agriculture are co......
  • Donovan v. Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers Intern. Union and Its Local 4-23, No. 83-4226
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • November 7, 1983
    ...of the Secretary's standards: (1) failure to clear debris (29 C.F.R. 1926.25(a)); (2) failure to protect employees against falls (29 C.F.R. 1926.28(a) and 1926.105(a)); (3) failure to guard an abrasive disk (29 C.F.R. 1926.303(b)); (4) failure to store oxygen cylinders properly (29 C.F.R. 1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
62 cases
  • Donovan v. Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers Intern. Union and Its Local 4-23, No. 83-4226
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • November 7, 1983
    ...of the Secretary's standards: (1) failure to clear debris (29 C.F.R. 1926.25(a)); (2) failure to protect employees against falls (29 C.F.R. 1926.28(a) and 1926.105(a)); (3) failure to guard an abrasive disk (29 C.F.R. 1926.303(b)); (4) failure to store oxygen cylinders properly (29 C.F.R. 1......
  • Faultless Div., Bliss & Laughlin Industries, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor, No. 81-1740
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • March 30, 1982
    ...S & H Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. OSHRC, 659 F.2d 1273 (5th Cir. 1981) (personal protective equipment for construction industry-29 C.F.R. § 1926.28(a) (1980)); Pratt & Whitney Aircraft, Division of United Technologies Corp. v. Secretary of Labor, 649 F.2d 96, 100-01 (2d Cir. 1981) (general ......
  • Flores v. Infrastructure Repair Serv., LLC
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • September 25, 2015
    ...40 U.S.C. § 3704(a)(1).Plaintiff thus has met his burden to demonstrate the merits of his reliance on defendant's violations of 29 C.F.R. §§ 1926.28 and 1926.102(a)(1)–(5) and on 29 C.F.R. § 1926.16(a) –(d) to impute responsibility for these violations to defendant, as evidence of defendant......
  • S & H Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Com'n, Nos. 79-2358
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • October 26, 1981
    ...whether an employer whose conduct is in compliance with the custom and practice of its industry may be found to have violated 29 C.F.R. § 1926.28(a), 1 the primary OSHA regulation pertaining to the provision of personal protective equipment to employees in the construction industry. We have......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT