29 CFR 1926.28 - Personal protective equipment
| Cite as | 29 CFR 1926.28 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
66 practice notes
-
Part III
...final rule incorporates PPE payment provisions into the OSHA standards applicable to general industry (29 CFR part 1910), construction (29 CFR part 1926), shipyards (29 CFR part 1915), longshoring (29 CFR part 1917), and marine terminals (29 CFR part \6\ Some employees in agriculture are co......
-
Safety and health standards, etc.: Employer payment for personal protective equipment,
...are codified in Subpart Z of 29 CFR 1910.1000). In other cases, however, such as in paragraph (a) of 29 CFR 1910.132 and paragraph (a) of 29 CFR 1926.28, who is required to pay for the PPE is not expressly specified. (For a complete list of OSHA's PPE requirements, see the Summary and Expla......
-
Separate Parts In This Issue
Part III
Labor Department, Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
...final rule incorporates PPE payment provisions into the OSHA standards applicable to general industry (29 CFR part 1910), construction (29 CFR part 1926), shipyards (29 CFR part 1915), longshoring (29 CFR part 1917), and marine terminals (29 CFR part \6\ Some employees in agriculture are co......
-
Flores v. Infrastructure Repair Serv., LLC
...40 U.S.C. § 3704(a)(1).Plaintiff thus has met his burden to demonstrate the merits of his reliance on defendant's violations of 29 C.F.R. §§ 1926.28 and 1926.102(a)(1)–(5) and on 29 C.F.R. § 1926.16(a) –(d) to impute responsibility for these violations to defendant, as evidence of defendant......
Request a trial to view additional results
61 cases
-
Flores v. Infrastructure Repair Serv., LLC
...40 U.S.C. § 3704(a)(1).Plaintiff thus has met his burden to demonstrate the merits of his reliance on defendant's violations of 29 C.F.R. §§ 1926.28 and 1926.102(a)(1)–(5) and on 29 C.F.R. § 1926.16(a) –(d) to impute responsibility for these violations to defendant, as evidence of defendant......
-
Dawson v. Bunker Hill Plaza Associates
...maintain a safe work place upon "the employer" which is defined as a "contractor or subcontractor." Id. at 476, 573 A.2d 922 (citing 29 C.F.R. §§ 1926.28(a) and 1926.32(k)). We also found that, according to OSHA regulations, "a prime or general contractor bears responsibility for all OSHA v......
-
S & H Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Com'n, Nos. 79-2358
...whether an employer whose conduct is in compliance with the custom and practice of its industry may be found to have violated 29 C.F.R. § 1926.28(a), 1 the primary OSHA regulation pertaining to the provision of personal protective equipment to employees in the construction industry. We have......
-
Faultless Div., Bliss & Laughlin Industries, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor, No. 81-1740
...S & H Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. OSHRC, 659 F.2d 1273 (5th Cir. 1981) (personal protective equipment for construction industry-29 C.F.R. § 1926.28(a) (1980)); Pratt & Whitney Aircraft, Division of United Technologies Corp. v. Secretary of Labor, 649 F.2d 96, 100-01 (2d Cir. 1981) (general ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
OSHA Guidance For COVID-19 Health and Safety Plans Required for Phased Reopenings of New York Businesses
...Where such risks cannot be adequately managed through those controls, appropriate PPE must be implemented. See, 29 C.F.R. §§ 1910.132 and 1926.28 and Subpart Masks and PPE will surely be the prime and foremost top-of-mind consideration of employers. Ordinarily, the decision of what PPE is a......