47 C.F.R. §1.1206 - Permit-but-disclose proceedings
| Cite as | 47 C.F.R. §1.1206 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
City of Arlington v. Fed. Commc'n Comm'n, 10-60039
...process when it issued the Declaratory Ruling. The cities base this argument on their assertion that the FCC failed to comply with 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a) when it considered CTIA's petition. A note to that regulation provides:In the case of petitions for declaratory ruling that seek Commissio......
-
City of Arlington v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 10–60039.
...process when it issued the Declaratory Ruling. The cities base this argument on their assertion that the FCC failed to comply with 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a) when it considered CTIA's petition. A note to that regulation provides: In the case of petitions for declaratory ruling that seek Commissi......
-
National Ass'n of State Util. Cons. Adv. V. F.C.C., 05-11682.
...with their monthly telephone bills. After the public comment period closed, during the so-called "permit but disclose" proceedings, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, the Commission received ex parte presentations and letters. On March 3, 2005, the State Utility Regulators provided notice of oral and ......
-
Totah Commc'ns, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n (In re FCC 11-161. Direct Commc'ns Cedar Valley, LLC)
...parte presentations in the record and file written summaries of all data and arguments presented in oral ex parte presentations. See47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(1)-(2). These rules also provide for submission of confidential information, FCC notice of ex parte presentations it has received, and a ......
Request a trial to view additional results