42 CFR 411.15 - Particular services excluded from coverage

Cite as42 CFR 411.15
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
92 practice notes
  • Maximum Comfort, Inc. v. Thompson, No. CIV. S-03-1584 LKK/PA.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Eastern District of California
    • June 28, 2004
    ...services and equipment, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395k, 1395l, 1395x(s), and provide for exclusions from coverage. 42 U.S.C. § 1395y(a)(2)-(16); 42 C.F.R. § 411.15(a)-(j). In all cases, Medicare coverage is limited to services that are medically "reasonable and necessary" for the diagnosis or treatment......
  • U.S. ex rel. Smith v. Yale University, No. 3:00CV1359 (PCD).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Connecticut)
    • February 14, 2006
    ...and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning of a malformed body member"); 42 C.F.R. § 411.15(k); see also Mikes, 274 F.3d at 702 (holding that "in submitting a Medicare reimbursement form, a defendant implicitly certifies compliance with §......
  • Yale-New Haven Hosp., Inc. v. Thompson, No. 3:99CV2546 (GLG).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Connecticut)
    • August 31, 2001
    ...... are not reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of illness or injury.... 42 U.S.C. § 1395y(a)(1)(A); see also 42 C.F.R. § 411.15(k)(1); Goodman v. Sullivan, 891 F.2d 449, 450 (2d Cir.1989). The Act, however, does not define the term "reasonable and necessary" but instea......
  • United States ex rel. Colquitt v. Abbott Labs., No. 3:06–cv–1769–M.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Northern District of Texas
    • August 24, 2012
    ...exceptions not relevant to this case, federal regulations prohibit Medicare coverage for experimental or investigational devices. 42 C.F.R. § 411.15( o). A device is investigational if it has not been approved by the FDA through the premarket approval process or the 510(k) clearance process......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
63 cases
  • Maximum Comfort, Inc. v. Thompson, No. CIV. S-03-1584 LKK/PA.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Eastern District of California
    • June 28, 2004
    ...services and equipment, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395k, 1395l, 1395x(s), and provide for exclusions from coverage. 42 U.S.C. § 1395y(a)(2)-(16); 42 C.F.R. § 411.15(a)-(j). In all cases, Medicare coverage is limited to services that are medically "reasonable and necessary" for the diagnosis or treatment......
  • U.S. ex rel. Smith v. Yale University, No. 3:00CV1359 (PCD).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Connecticut)
    • February 14, 2006
    ...and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning of a malformed body member"); 42 C.F.R. § 411.15(k); see also Mikes, 274 F.3d at 702 (holding that "in submitting a Medicare reimbursement form, a defendant implicitly certifies compliance with §......
  • Yale-New Haven Hosp., Inc. v. Thompson, No. 3:99CV2546 (GLG).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Connecticut)
    • August 31, 2001
    ...... are not reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of illness or injury.... 42 U.S.C. § 1395y(a)(1)(A); see also 42 C.F.R. § 411.15(k)(1); Goodman v. Sullivan, 891 F.2d 449, 450 (2d Cir.1989). The Act, however, does not define the term "reasonable and necessary" but instea......
  • United States ex rel. Colquitt v. Abbott Labs., No. 3:06–cv–1769–M.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Northern District of Texas
    • August 24, 2012
    ...exceptions not relevant to this case, federal regulations prohibit Medicare coverage for experimental or investigational devices. 42 C.F.R. § 411.15( o). A device is investigational if it has not been approved by the FDA through the premarket approval process or the 510(k) clearance process......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
  • CMS Issues Guidance for COVID-19 Treatments & Vaccines
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • December 24, 2020
    ...the vaccine and its administration as a result of amendments made to the Social Security Act § 1861(s)(10) and 42 C.F.R. §§ 410.57, 410.152, 411.15, 414.701, 414.707, 414.900, and These statutory and regulatory amendments together incorporate COVID-19 vaccines as preventative immunizations ......
  • 6 Takeaways From LabSolutions 'Unnecessary Testing' Verdict
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • January 17, 2023
    ...and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning of a malformed body member," and 42 C.F.R. § 411.15(a)(1), which provides that Medicare does not cover "examinations performed for a purpose other than treatment or diagnosis of a specific illnes......
  • Decoding DOJ’s Crackdown on Genetic Testing: High-Profile Indictments and Practical Takeaways for the Cancer and Pharma Genomics Industries
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • March 25, 2020
    ...and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning of a malformed body member,” and 42 C.F.R. § 411.15(a)(1), which provides that, unless an exception applies, there is no coverage for “[e]xaminations performed for a purpose other than treatment ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT