28 CFR 2.20 - Paroling policy guidelines: Statement of general policy
| Cite as | 28 CFR 2.20 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
477 practice notes
-
Drayton v. McCall, No. 1089
...that until final physical release occurs, the Board does not relinquish its broad discretionary powers to rescind any future parole. (28 C.F.R. § 2.20). The Board never gave up its custody of Sexton and therefore could properly rescind his conditional parole without affording him a full Mor......
-
Wilson v. Fullwood, Civil Action No. 09–2365 (CKK).
...application of the 1987 Regulations to his D.C. Code violations, and presumably to also include application of the regulations in 28 C.F.R. § 2.20 to his U.S. Code violation. Compl. at 5. He does not specifically request that parole be granted now or at some other date. See id. As to the 19......
-
US v. Brodie, Crim. No. 87-0492.
...are therefore either not involved at all or are substantially attenuated. Additionally, the parole guidelines are only advisory, 28 C.F.R. § 2.20(e); Congress itself decided when a prisoner will be eligible for parole and what criteria were to be used for parole decisions, 18 U.S.C. §§ 4205......
-
Gambino v. Morris, No. 96-5299
...less than 999 grams of pure heroin. See U.S. Parole Commission Offense Behavior Severity Index, Chapter Nine, Subchapter A, p 901(d), 28 C.F.R. § 2.20 (1995). 3 The Panel assessed his salient factor score as 10 out of 10, with 10 representing the lowest risk of parole violation. See id. (Sa......
Request a trial to view additional results
471 cases
-
Drayton v. McCall, No. 1089
...that until final physical release occurs, the Board does not relinquish its broad discretionary powers to rescind any future parole. (28 C.F.R. § 2.20). The Board never gave up its custody of Sexton and therefore could properly rescind his conditional parole without affording him a full Mor......
-
Wilson v. Fullwood, Civil Action No. 09–2365 (CKK).
...application of the 1987 Regulations to his D.C. Code violations, and presumably to also include application of the regulations in 28 C.F.R. § 2.20 to his U.S. Code violation. Compl. at 5. He does not specifically request that parole be granted now or at some other date. See id. As to the 19......
-
US v. Brodie, Crim. No. 87-0492.
...are therefore either not involved at all or are substantially attenuated. Additionally, the parole guidelines are only advisory, 28 C.F.R. § 2.20(e); Congress itself decided when a prisoner will be eligible for parole and what criteria were to be used for parole decisions, 18 U.S.C. §§ 4205......
-
Gambino v. Morris, No. 96-5299
...less than 999 grams of pure heroin. See U.S. Parole Commission Offense Behavior Severity Index, Chapter Nine, Subchapter A, p 901(d), 28 C.F.R. § 2.20 (1995). 3 The Panel assessed his salient factor score as 10 out of 10, with 10 representing the lowest risk of parole violation. See id. (Sa......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
What states should do to provide a meaningful opportunity for review and release: recognize human worth and potential.
...COLO. REV. STAT. § 17-22.5-404 (2011); CONN. GEN. STAT. § 54-125a (2012); FLA. ADMIN. CODE ANN. r. 23-21.006 (2012). (160.) See, e.g., 28 C.F.R. § 2.20(h) (161.) See MD. CODE ANN., CORR. SERVS. § 7-305 (West 2012). Parole boards in other states also consider a litany of factors when determi......