49 CFR 172.426 - OXIDIZER label

Cite as49 CFR 172.426
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Tekavec v. Van Waters & Rogers, Inc., No. 5:97 CV 0571.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court of Northern District of Ohio
    • 30 Junio 1998
    ...Safety and Health Administration ("OSHA") to place warnings on hazardous chemical drums. See 49 C.F.R. § 172.301; 49 C.F.R. § 172.400; 49 C.F.R. § 172.426; and 29 C.F.R. § 1910.1200(b)(1). Van Waters & Rogers then argues that under the reasoning of Vercellotti, its compliance with the label......
  • Lawing v. Trinity Mfg., Inc.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of South Carolina
    • 21 Agosto 2013
    ...ink. The United States Department of Transportation requires this symbol to be used in labeling oxidizers such as sodium bromate. See 49 C.F.R. § 172.426 (2003) (requiring "the OXIDIZER label must be as follows," with image of symbol, and "the background color on the OXIDIZER label must be ......
  • Lawing v. Trinity Mfg., Inc., No. 5166.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of South Carolina
    • 22 Octubre 2013
    ...ink. The United States Department of Transportation requires this symbol to be used in labeling oxidizers such as sodium bromate. See49 C.F.R. § 172.426 (2003) (requiring “the OXIDIZER label must be as follows,” with image of symbol, and “the background color on the OXIDIZER label must be y......
  • Lawing v. Univar, USA, Inc., Appellate Case No. 2013–002464.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of South Carolina
    • 2 Diciembre 2015
    ...The United States Department of Transportation requires this symbol be used in the labeling of oxidizers such as sodium bromate. See 49 C.F.R. § 172.426 (2003).4 Along with the delivery of the chemical, Engelhard was provided the MSDS for sodium bromate. The MSDS warned that if sodium broma......
4 cases
  • Tekavec v. Van Waters & Rogers, Inc., 5:97 CV 0571.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court of Northern District of Ohio
    • 30 Junio 1998
    ...Safety and Health Administration ("OSHA") to place warnings on hazardous chemical drums. See 49 C.F.R. § 172.301; 49 C.F.R. § 172.400; 49 C.F.R. § 172.426; and 29 C.F.R. § 1910.1200(b)(1). Van Waters & Rogers then argues that under the reasoning of Vercellotti, its compliance with the label......
  • Lawing v. Trinity Mfg., Inc.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of South Carolina
    • 21 Agosto 2013
    ...ink. The United States Department of Transportation requires this symbol to be used in labeling oxidizers such as sodium bromate. See 49 C.F.R. § 172.426 (2003) (requiring "the OXIDIZER label must be as follows," with image of symbol, and "the background color on the OXIDIZER label must be ......
  • Lawing v. Trinity Mfg., Inc., 5166.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of South Carolina
    • 22 Octubre 2013
    ...ink. The United States Department of Transportation requires this symbol to be used in labeling oxidizers such as sodium bromate. See49 C.F.R. § 172.426 (2003) (requiring “the OXIDIZER label must be as follows,” with image of symbol, and “the background color on the OXIDIZER label must be y......
  • Lawing v. Univar, USA, Inc., Appellate Case No. 2013–002464.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of South Carolina
    • 2 Diciembre 2015
    ...The United States Department of Transportation requires this symbol be used in the labeling of oxidizers such as sodium bromate. See 49 C.F.R. § 172.426 (2003).4 Along with the delivery of the chemical, Engelhard was provided the MSDS for sodium bromate. The MSDS warned that if sodium broma......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT