16 CFR 436.10 - Other laws and rules
| Cite as | 16 CFR 436.10 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
Colo. Coffee Bean Llc v. Peaberry Coffee Inc., No. 09CA0130.
...with this policy. See id. at 15444. 12. The FTC has since elevated this preemption language into the text of the amended rule. 16 C.F.R. § 436.10(b) (2007); see also 72 Fed.Reg. at 15537. 13. The commentary further addresses the question of preemption: Congress did not intend the Act to occ......
-
Part III
...the revised proposed Rule.\162\ \160\ 42 U.S.C. 17305. \161\ See, e.g., Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions Concerning Franchising, 16 CFR 436.10(b). \162\ 74 FR at No commenters addressed preemption of state law. Accordingly, the final Rule adopts the preemption provision proposed in ......
-
Prohibitions On Market Manipulation and False Information in Subtitle B of Title VIII of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007
...by the proposed Rule.\147\ \146\ 42 U.S.C. 17305. \147\ See, e.g., Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions Concerning Franchising, 16 CFR 436.10(b); Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions Concerning Business Opportunities, 16 CFR 437 G. Section 317.5: Severability Section 317.5 of the pr......
-
Hanley v. Doctors Express Franchising, LLC, Civil Action No. ELH-12-795
...or greater protection" than the federal Franchise Rule, "such as registration of disclosure documents or more extensive disclosures." 16 C.F.R. § 436.10(b). Maryland has enacted such provisions, by way of the Maryland Franchise Law.Page 4 According to plaintiffs, the version of Doctors Expr......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
Colo. Coffee Bean Llc v. Peaberry Coffee Inc., No. 09CA0130.
...with this policy. See id. at 15444. 12. The FTC has since elevated this preemption language into the text of the amended rule. 16 C.F.R. § 436.10(b) (2007); see also 72 Fed.Reg. at 15537. 13. The commentary further addresses the question of preemption: Congress did not intend the Act to occ......
-
Colorado Coffee Bean, LLC v. Peaberry Coffee Inc., Court of Appeals No. 09CA0130 (Colo. App. 2/18/2010), No. 09CA0130.
...with this policy. See id. at 15444. 12. The FTC has since elevated this preemption language into the text of the amended rule. 16 C.F.R. § 436.10(b) (2007); see also 72 Fed. Reg. at 13. The commentary further addresses the question of preemption: Congress did not intend the Act to occupy th......
-
Hanley v. Doctors Express Franchising, LLC, Civil Action No. ELH-12-795
...or greater protection" than the federal Franchise Rule, "such as registration of disclosure documents or more extensive disclosures." 16 C.F.R. § 436.10(b). Maryland has enacted such provisions, by way of the Maryland Franchise Law.Page 4 According to plaintiffs, the version of Doctors Expr......
-
Patel v. 7-Eleven, Inc., SJC-13166
..."[a] law is not inconsistent with 19 [the FTC Franchise Rule] if it affords prospective franchisees equal or greater protection." 16 C.F.R. § 436.10(b). Setting aside that compliance with the FTC Franchise Rule only requires certain timely disclosures, the franchisor's election to exercise ......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Taking The Leap: Bringing A Foreign Brand To The United States
...can incorporate the comment responses in the documents prepared once it reaches its first annual renewal 63 See Note 39 above. 64 16 C.F.R. §436.10(b) “The FTC Rule provides that states may impose additional disclosure requirements.” following its next fiscal year end. It can then generate ......
1 books & journal articles
-
International Issues
...FundAmentAls oF internAtionAl FrAnchising (William Woods ed., 2d ed. 2012). 3. 16 C.F.R. § 436.2 (2013). 4. See supra note 3. 5. 16 C.F.R. § 436.10 (2013) (“The FTC does not intend to preempt the franchise practices laws of any state or local government, except to the extent of any inconsis......