21 CFR 1301.37 - Order to show cause

Cite as21 CFR 1301.37
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
27 practice notes
  • Pharmacy Doctors Enterprises d/b/a Zion Clinic Pharmacy; Decision and Order
    • United States
    • Federal Register March 13, 2018
    • March 13, 2018
    ...I do not sustain this allegation due to the Government's failure to comply with the notice requirements for a Show Cause Order. 21 CFR 1301.37(c). I find that Respondent filled at least one controlled substance prescription written by a physician for the physician's personal use, although I......
  • Registration revocations, restrictions, denials, reinstatements: Chein, Edmund, MD,
    • United States
    • Federal Register February 12, 2007
    • February 12, 2007
    ...and the Administrative Procedure Act require that an Order to Show Cause contain ``a summary of the matters of fact and law asserted,'' 21 CFR 1301.37(c), an agency is not required ``to give [Respondent] a complete bill of particulars as to every allegation that [it] will confront.'' Boston......
  • Morris & Dickson Co. v. Whitaker, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 18-1406
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Western District of Louisiana
    • December 28, 2018
    ...issue a rule to show cause describing the grounds for revocation and conduct a hearing in accordance with the APA. Id. § 824(c) ; 21 C.F.R. § 1301.37(c). Following the hearing, the presiding ALJ issues a report recommending findings of fact and conclusions of law; the ALJ forwards this repo......
  • Cardinal Health, Inc. v. Holder, Civil Action No. 12–185 (RBW).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • March 7, 2012
    ...such hearing and for the denial, revocation, or suspension of registration and a summary of the matters of fact and law asserted.” 21 C.F.R. § 1301.37(c). However, in cases where the DEA has reason to believe that a registrant's continued operation would pose “an imminent danger to the publ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
  • Morris & Dickson Co. v. Whitaker, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 18-1406
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Western District of Louisiana
    • December 28, 2018
    ...issue a rule to show cause describing the grounds for revocation and conduct a hearing in accordance with the APA. Id. § 824(c) ; 21 C.F.R. § 1301.37(c). Following the hearing, the presiding ALJ issues a report recommending findings of fact and conclusions of law; the ALJ forwards this repo......
  • Cardinal Health, Inc. v. Holder, Civil Action No. 12–185 (RBW).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • March 7, 2012
    ...such hearing and for the denial, revocation, or suspension of registration and a summary of the matters of fact and law asserted.” 21 C.F.R. § 1301.37(c). However, in cases where the DEA has reason to believe that a registrant's continued operation would pose “an imminent danger to the publ......
  • Holiday CVS, L.L.C. v. Holder, Civil Action No. 12–191 (RBW).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • March 16, 2012
    ...such hearing and for the denial, revocation, or suspension of registration and a summary of the matters of fact and law asserted.” 21 C.F.R. § 1301.37(c). In cases where the DEA has reason to believe that a registrant's continued operation would pose “an imminent danger to the public health......
  • Craker v. Drug Enforcement Admin., No. 09–1220.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • April 15, 2013
    ...issued an order to show cause, proposing the denial of Dr. Craker's registration application. Id. at 2101;see21 U.S.C. § 824(c); 21 C.F.R. § 1301.37(a), (c). The order first concluded that Dr. Craker's registration “would not be consistent with the public interest as that term is used in 21......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT