40 CFR 68.69 - Operating procedures
| Cite as | 40 CFR 68.69 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
U.S. v. Bp Products North America Inc., Criminal No. H-07-434.
...and supervisors and to ensure that alarm systems and process safety components in the ISOM unit were operating correctly, see 40 C.F.R. §§ 68.69(a), 68.73(b), on the morning of March 23, 2005, safeguards important to the safe startup of the raffinate splitter either had not been established......
-
United States v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Criminal No. H-21-16
...contractor, laboratory, or other support personnel. These safe work practices shall apply to employees and contractor employees. 40 C.F.R. § 68.69(d) (emphasis added).Count One alleges that DuPont and Sandel, the Unit Operations Leader of the Insecticide Business Unit, (together, "DuPont") ......
-
United States v. E.l. Du Pont de Nemours & Co, CRIMINAL H-21-16
...contractor, laboratory, or other support personnel. These safe work practices shall apply to employees and contractor employees. 40 C.F.R. § 68.69(d) (emphasis added). Count One alleges that DuPont and Sandel, the Unit Operations Leader of the Insecticide Business Unit, (together, “DuPont”)......
-
United States v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Civil Action No. 2:14-25143
...and 40 C.F.R. § 68.67(f);COUNT 3: Failure to Develop and Implement Operating Procedures in Violation of 42 U.S.C. § 7412(r)(7) and 40 C.F.R. § 68.69(a) and (c);COUNT 4: Failure to Comply with Inspection and Testing for Mechanical Integrity in Violation of 42 U.S.C. § 112(r)(7) and 40 C.F.R.......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
U.S. v. Bp Products North America Inc., Criminal No. H-07-434.
...and supervisors and to ensure that alarm systems and process safety components in the ISOM unit were operating correctly, see 40 C.F.R. §§ 68.69(a), 68.73(b), on the morning of March 23, 2005, safeguards important to the safe startup of the raffinate splitter either had not been established......
-
United States v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Criminal No. H-21-16
...contractor, laboratory, or other support personnel. These safe work practices shall apply to employees and contractor employees. 40 C.F.R. § 68.69(d) (emphasis added).Count One alleges that DuPont and Sandel, the Unit Operations Leader of the Insecticide Business Unit, (together, "DuPont") ......
-
United States v. E.l. Du Pont de Nemours & Co, CRIMINAL H-21-16
...contractor, laboratory, or other support personnel. These safe work practices shall apply to employees and contractor employees. 40 C.F.R. § 68.69(d) (emphasis added). Count One alleges that DuPont and Sandel, the Unit Operations Leader of the Insecticide Business Unit, (together, “DuPont”)......
-
United States v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Civil Action No. 2:14-25143
...and 40 C.F.R. § 68.67(f);COUNT 3: Failure to Develop and Implement Operating Procedures in Violation of 42 U.S.C. § 7412(r)(7) and 40 C.F.R. § 68.69(a) and (c);COUNT 4: Failure to Comply with Inspection and Testing for Mechanical Integrity in Violation of 42 U.S.C. § 112(r)(7) and 40 C.F.R.......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
-
112(r)/Air Enforcement: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Clarksville, Tennessee, Brake Manufacturing Facility Enter into Expedited Settlement Agreement
...It reviewed the operating procedures as often as necessary and certified annually that they are current and accurate as required by 40 C.F.R. § 68.69(c). The ESA assesses a civil penalty of A copy of the ESA can be downloaded here. Walter Wright...
-
112(r)/Air Enforcement: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Ketchikan, Alaska Facility Enter into Expedited Settlement Agreement
...be affected by the recommendations as required in 40 C.F.R. § 68.67(e). Failure to address consequences of deviation as required in 40 C.F.R. § 68.69(a)(2)(i). Failure to address steps required to correct or avoid deviation as required in 40 C.F.R. § 68.69(a)(2)(ii) Failure to address safet......
-
112(r)/Clean Air Act Enforcement: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Westfield, New York Facility Enter into Consent Agreement
...of 40 C.F.R. § 68.67(c); the process safety information requirements of 40 C.F.R. § 68.65; the operating procedures requirements of 40 C.F.R. § 68.69; the mechanical integrity program requirements of 40 C.F.R. § 68.73. The CAFO concludes that the Facility is a stationary source and has hand......
-
112(r) Clean Air Act/Enforcement: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Operator of Winchester, Kentucky Cold Food Storage Facility Enter into Consent Agreement
...procedures as often as necessary and to annually certify that the operating procedures are current and accurate, as required by 40 C.F.R. § 68.69(c); Failed to initially train each employee in an overview of the process and in the operating procedures before being involved in operating a ne......