25 CFR 2.4 - Officials who may decide appeals
| Cite as | 25 CFR 2.4 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
37 practice notes
-
Villegas v. United States, CV–12–0001–EFS.
...Regulations establishes the chain of authority to decide appeal of agency decisions, including agency inaction. See, e.g.,25 C.F.R. §§ 2.3, 2.4(a), 2.6(a) & 2.8. As was the issue with his original Complaint, Plaintiff has not demonstrated that he properly raised his vaguely-pled APA violati......
-
Western Shoshone Business Council For and on Behalf of Western Shoshone Tribe of Duck Valley Reservation v. Babbitt, 92-4062
...The regulations regarding appeals from BIA decisions provide that a decision made by an Area Director may be appealed to the IBIA, 25 C.F.R. Sec. 2.4(e), and that the IBIA is the final authority for the Department of the Interior on administrative actions by BIA officials. 43 C.F.R. Page 10......
-
Crawford-Hall v. United States, Case No. 2:17-cv-01616-SVW-AFM
...Decision"). See AR0258.3425-66. In the 2017 Decision, Principal Deputy Roberts concluded:Pursuant to the authority delegated to me by 25 C.F.R. § 2.4(c), I affirm the Regional Director's December 24, 2014 decision to take approximately 1,427.28 acres of land in trust for the Santa Ynez Band......
-
Sokaogon Chippewa Community v. Babbitt, 95-C-659-C.
...— Indian Affairs (other than the deputy in charge of Indian Education Programs) are appealable to the Interior Board of Indian Appeals. 25 C.F.R. § 2.4(e). An appealable decision is not considered a final departmental decision subject to judicial review under 5 U.S.C. § 704 unless the offic......
Request a trial to view additional results
35 cases
-
Crawford-Hall v. United States, Case No. 2:17-cv-01616-SVW-AFM
...Decision"). See AR0258.3425-66. In the 2017 Decision, Principal Deputy Roberts concluded:Pursuant to the authority delegated to me by 25 C.F.R. § 2.4(c), I affirm the Regional Director's December 24, 2014 decision to take approximately 1,427.28 acres of land in trust for the Santa Ynez Band......
-
Villegas v. United States, No. CV–12–0001–EFS.
...Regulations establishes the chain of authority to decide appeal of agency decisions, including agency inaction. See, e.g.,25 C.F.R. §§ 2.3, 2.4(a), 2.6(a) & 2.8. As was the issue with his original Complaint, Plaintiff has not demonstrated that he properly raised his vaguely-pled APA violati......
-
Villegas v. United States, No. CV–12–0001–EFS.
...Regulations establishes the chain of authority to decide appeal of agency decisions, including agency inaction. See, e.g.,25 C.F.R. §§ 2.3, 2.4(a), 2.6(a), 2.8. Plaintiff has not demonstrated that he properly raised his allegations of APA violations at any level of BIA review, much less exh......
-
Begay v. Pub. Serv. Co. of N.M. (pnm), No. CIV 09-0137 JB/RLP
...cancel the administrative-remedy process. See Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes Okla. v. United States, 966 F.2d 583, 588 (10th Cir.1992) (citing 25 C.F.R. § 2.4 (1981)). Instead, failure of the agency to give notice of the initial agency action simply extends the time in which the plaintiff can appe......
Request a trial to view additional results